University of Ljubljana vs The Open University of Israel - OUI vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 57 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Well-structured and challenging academic programs
- +Human-centered approach and personal focus on students
- +Flexible and progressive study options
- +High-quality, self-contained learning materials
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Limited campus integration and lack of social cohesion between faculties.
- -Uninspired and unchallenging academic work, including assignments and exams.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources hinder learning.
- -Communication is poor and feedback mechanisms are ineffective.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
Academic and student experience metrics reveal a university excelling in certain aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, closely followed by Student Life. Conversely, Internationality presents the lowest score. Other areas like Professors and Value also received strong marks, while Facilities and Accomodation fall in the mid-range of ratings.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution received a uniform rating of zero. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas to highlight, as every category received the same minimal score. This suggests a consistent lack of perceived quality or development in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 49 reviews, approximately 98% are positive. Students highlight knowledgeable professors, well-structured courses, and a welcoming environment. One negative review mentioned less challenging assignments and exams.
With one review, the average rating is a perfect 5/5. This positive feedback (~100%) highlights the university's flexibility, progressive approach to student duties and qualifications, and the coherence and accuracy of its study materials.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
The openu is flexible and progressive in terms of students duties, qualification and choice of subjects.It basically offers a DIY B.A. The greatest thing about it is the books, which since are purposed for students to learn the material solely from them, are super coherent and accurate.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
