University of Ljubljana vs Shahjalal University of Science and Technology - SUST vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Challenging and interdisciplinary programs
- +Supportive and approachable professors
- +Welcoming environment and personal development opportunities
- +High-quality education and teaching methods
- +Friendly student environment and diverse opportunities
- +Strong reputation and research focus
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Communication and transparency issues
- -Lack of challenging assignments and exams
- -Limited social interaction between faculties
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Inadequate teaching quality and insufficient advanced courses are a significant concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are poorly handled.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
Student feedback indicates a well-rounded university experience, with **Location** and **Student Life** receiving the highest marks. Professors also earned strong praise. Conversely, **Internationality** was rated the lowest among the surveyed aspects, suggesting room for improvement in global engagement. Other areas like Facilities, Accommodation, and Value were rated moderately well.
This institution garners excellent feedback, with its **location** and **student life** achieving the highest marks at 4.63. **Professors** also received strong praise at 4.42. Conversely, **accommodation** and **internationality** represent the areas with the lowest scores, both around 3.84-3.89, indicating potential for improvement in these specific aspects. The overall **value** is rated highly at 4.32.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
With a 4.2/5 average rating from 50 reviews, ~94% praise academically challenging programs, interdisciplinary collaboration, and supportive professors. One review found assignments and exams unchallenging.
With an average rating of 4.42/5, around 95% of reviews are positive, highlighting a friendly environment, good quality education, and research opportunities. A small percentage of feedback mentions department limitations and a high-pressure environment.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
Sylhet's Shahjalal University of Science and Technology (SUST) is a well-known university that has made significant growth. Various academic and extracurricular activities have elevated this university to national and worldwide prominence. Teachers and students participate in a variety of programs to help the institution become a centre of excellence. I got every opportunity to learn a lot as a computer science student.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
