University of Ljubljana vs University of Ljubljana Faculty of Computer and Information Science vs Enugu State University of Science and Technology - ESUT vs NTF-Faculty of Natural Sciences and Engineering vs IEDC-Bled School of Management
Side-by-side comparison from 119 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic standards and expert, approachable professors
- +Human-centered approach and good professor-student relationships
- +Quality, interesting programs with practical elements
- +Approachable and skilled professors with interesting and relevant courses.
- +Modern facilities and flexible curriculum allowing student choice.
- +Good balance of theory and practical learning with organized student activities.
- +Strong academic programs and practical skill development.
- +Supportive environment and valuable learning experiences.
- +Excellent faculty and relevant course content.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Knowledgeable, approachable professors
- +Well-structured classes and hands-on labs
- +Modern campus with great facilities
- -Fragmented campus layout hindering community.
- -Lack of academic challenge in assignments and exams.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated or in poor condition.
- -The cost of attendance is perceived as too high for the value received.
- -Overcrowded lecture halls and lack of accommodation
- -Inconsistent and unengaging teaching quality
- -Perceived corruption and focus on financial gain over education
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
This university demonstrates particular strengths in its **Location**, achieving a high rating of 4.55, and **Student Life**, with a score of 4.4125. The **Value** proposition is also well-regarded at 4.173. Conversely, the university's **Internationality** received the lowest rating at 3.365, suggesting this area could benefit from further development. Other categories like Facilities, Professors, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range.
This institution excels in its facilities, boasting an impressive rating of 4.67. Student life and value for money are also highly regarded, both scoring 4.33. Conversely, the university's internationality received the lowest marks at 3.67, with location also appearing as a comparatively weaker area at 3.83. Professors and accommodation were rated moderately at 4.
The surveyed university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with its strongest areas being **Professors** and **Value**, both scoring above 3.78. **Location** and **Student Life** also received favorable ratings. Conversely, **Facilities** emerge as the weakest point, with the lowest score at 3.16, closely followed by **Internationality**. **Accomodation** falls in the middle range.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This university receives strong marks in several key areas, notably achieving a perfect score for its **Location** and excellent ratings for **Value** and **Professors**. Facilities and student life also score well. Accommodation represents the weakest aspect, with a rating of 3, indicating potential areas for improvement in student housing options. Internationality and facilities are rated favorably at 4.
Nearly 98% of reviews are positive, highlighting high academic standards, approachable professors, and good student-teacher relationships. One negative review found assignments and exams not challenging.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100% of 6 reviews), with an average rating of 4.17/5. Students praise modern facilities, skilled and approachable professors, and relevant, balanced courses. Some note a high workload.
With ~74% positive reviews, students highlight strong science, engineering, and technology programs with practical applications. About 7.8% of feedback is negative, mentioning issues like overcrowded classes and lack of accommodation.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The single review for the Veterinary Medicine program is overwhelmingly positive (100%), with a 4/5 average rating. Strengths highlighted include knowledgeable professors, well-structured classes, engaging lab sessions, modern facilities, and a student-friendly city.
The university offered strong academics with some of the best professors and researchers in the country. Some proffessors did take a lot of academic liberty though, but that did contribute to the overall student experience. Ljubljana is an amazing student city, very welcoming, safe and warm, but houseng opportunities can scarce.
Nothing to show
Enugu State University of Science and Technology (ESUT) offers a solid academic foundation, especially in science and engineering fields. The lecturers are knowledgeable and passionate, and I appreciated the strong sense of community among students. Likes: - Affordable tuition - Good academic structure - Dedicated lecturers in some faculties - Strong alumni network Dislikes: - Inconsistent academic calendar - Poor infrastructure and limited resources - Administrative delays - some sexual harassment from some lecturers Would I recommend it? Yes — if you're determined and can adapt to challenges, ESUT will teach you both academics and resilience. However, I’d also encourage future students to be proactive and patient with the system.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
