EU Business School vs University of St. Gallen - HSG vs FHS St.Gallen University of Applied Sciences vs EHL Hospitality Business School - EHL vs IPAC
Side-by-side comparison from 331 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Supportive faculty and great learning opportunities
- +Stimulating environment for personal and academic growth
- +Strong reputation and career prospects
Nothing to show
- +Strong global network and personal growth
- +Practical industry experience and diverse opportunities
- +Supportive and engaging learning environment
- +Excellent and helpful online classes and lectures
- +Beautiful campus and vibrant student life
- +Strong academic reputation and international recognition
- +Practical, interdisciplinary teaching
- +Pleasant atmosphere with lecturers and students
- +Good cafeteria food options
- +Comprehensive sports industry immersion
- +Networking and real-world connections
- +Diverse and international cohort
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Convoluted teaching material and low-quality content make learning difficult.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unsupportive staff and bureaucratic hurdles, cause significant delays.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a significant drawback.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and not preparing students for the future.
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and insufficient support are problematic.
- -Material is not fully in English and local students are insular.
- -Teachers lack enthusiasm and suggest inadequate translation tools.
- -The program has too many minor subjects, hindering focus on core learning.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of support and engagement from staff is disappointing.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Across surveyed categories, the university's professors received the highest rating, indicating a strong area of performance. Conversely, student life and value for money emerged as areas with the lowest scores. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality were rated moderately. Location also fell within a similar, mid-range evaluation.
Nothing to show
Exhibiting particularly strong performance, the university achieved its highest rating in Internationality, followed closely by Facilities and Student Life. Conversely, Location received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. Other well-regarded areas include Accomodation, Value, and Professors, all scoring well above average.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for Location, Student Life, and Accomodation. Facilities and Value also received strong marks. Professors and Internationality were rated well, though they represent the areas with slightly lower, yet still positive, scores compared to the university's standout features.
This institution excels in its **Location** and **Accomodation**, both scoring a strong 4.5 and 4 respectively. The **Professors** and **Student Life** also receive a solid 3.5. However, **Facilities** and **Internationality** present areas for improvement, each receiving a lower rating of 2.5. The university offers good **Value** at 4.
This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its location and internationality, receiving the highest marks in these areas. Facilities and professors also scored very well, indicating a high standard of academic and physical resources. Student life is rated positively, though not as high as the top-performing categories. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received the lowest score, suggesting room for improvement in student housing offerings. Overall value is rated favorably.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, great learning and career opportunities, and a stimulating environment. Some negative feedback mentions convoluted teaching materials and administrative issues.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.77/5 from 57 reviews, ~95% highlight positive experiences. Recurring themes include skill development and valuable internships. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 3.5/5, positive feedback (~50%) highlights excellent online classes and a great learning environment. Negative feedback is negligible, representing ~0% of the total.
With an average rating of 3/5, university student feedback is split evenly. Positive comments highlight practical teaching and a pleasant atmosphere, while negative points focus on limited space and international student integration challenges.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (average 4.67/5) highlights program organization, networking opportunities, and comprehensive coverage of the sports industry. Some mention high living costs in Lausanne.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
A very nice college with supportive faculty and great learning opportunities. I gained a lot of knowledge, skills, and experiences that will help me in my future career.This college provides a wonderful environment for learning and growth. The faculty is supportive, the campus is vibrant, and I have learned so much academically and personally here
Nothing to show
Choosing EHL was a very intentional decision for me. As an extroverted person passionate about hospitality, I wanted a university where service excellence is not only taught but truly practiced. EHL stood out because of its balance between academic rigor and hands-on experience. The AP (preparatory year) program had a big impact on me. Working in operational roles such as fine dining service, front office, pastry taught me discipline, attention to detail, and how to perform under pressure. It gave me real confidence in guest interaction and teamwork. Academically, I especially enjoyed classes related to financial accounting and economics as they helped me better understand how people and businesses function together. EHL’s career support also made a real difference. The interview preparation and guidance helped me secure my Front Office internship at Jumeirah Marsa Al Arab, which was a major opportunity for me. What makes EHL distinctive is its international environment and high standards. You’re constantly surrounded by ambitious, driven students, which pushes me to grow both personally and professionally. My advice to future students is to fully embrace the operational experience; it builds resilience and professionalism that truly sets you apart.
Nothing to show
What I liked: -Sustainable concerns of the school -Partnership with Social Education University in order to deliver social related modules What I didn't like while being registered to an international program: -Some material modules are still in German, some teachers suggested to translate them on Deepl -Local students are not very open-minded... tend to create their own circles and don't include international students -Even though the program is supposed to be taught in English, more minors are given in German than in English, which reduces the minors choices to 3 only... To improve: -Class materials and/or explanations can be given in English even though the student asked a question in Swiss-German (more inclusive) -More inclusive events, even though students can not be forced to take part in them, help international students to be included by locals Recommend? : I do not think that I would recommend international students to study there. I studied one year in Geneva, and the international program there is more inclusive than the one in Lucerne.
The 15 months at AISTS were truly enlightening. What sets this program apart is its exceptional support system, offering unparalleled professional guidance and prioritizing mental health and wellness.
