London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs ONCAMPUS Global vs University of Surrey vs Surrey Business School vs The University of Law Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 605 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive and approachable teachers
- +Excellent student support services
- +Convenient campus location and facilities
- +Knowledgeable and approachable staff
- +Accessible online course materials
- +Great campus environment and social opportunities
- +Relevant, well-designed programmes with real-world application
- +Strong support from knowledgeable and approachable staff
- +Excellent career prospects and placement opportunities
- +Supportive staff and wellbeing resources
- +Smooth application process and fast feedback
- +Career coaching and employable skills development
- +Supportive and knowledgeable tutors
- +Engaging daily webinars with market analysis
- +Improved trading profitability and understanding
- +Practical, industry-focused education and connections
- +Diverse contemporary music programs and courses
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of clear communication are frustrating.
- -Limited resources and support for academic needs are a concern.
- -Poor management and unfair policies favoring certain student groups.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure.
- -Negative campus culture and alleged corruption.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are frequently mentioned.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance were major drawbacks.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from faculty was a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of engagement and uninspired teaching methods are disliked.
- -Administrative and management issues frequently disrupt student experience.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder practical learning opportunities.
- -Limited career support and industry connections fail to prepare graduates.
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
This institution garners strong approval across multiple aspects, with particularly high marks for its **Professors (4.76)** and **Location (4.75)**. Student life and internationality also score well, above 4.5. **Accommodations (4.35)** received the lowest rating, though still generally positive, while facilities and value demonstrate solid, above-average performance.
Across multiple metrics, this university garners strong approval. Its facilities stand out with an impressive 4.76 score, closely followed by professors at 4.71 and internationality at 4.70. While location and value also score well, the lowest-rated area, though still positive, is accommodation at 4.59. Overall, the institution presents a well-rounded, high-achieving academic environment.
This university garners exceptionally high marks, particularly excelling in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring nearly a perfect 4.9. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** also received outstanding ratings close to 4.9. The primary area for improvement seems to be **Value**, which, while still strong, is the lowest-rated category at 4.6. Overall, student life and professors' ratings are also highly favorable.
This institution shines in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for its facilities and location, alongside excellent marks for internationality and value. Student life receives a solid rating. However, accommodation stands out as a weaker point, scoring significantly lower than other aspects. Professors are also highly regarded.
Across numerous metrics, this institution demonstrates exceptional strengths. Facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality all garnered perfect scores, indicating outstanding offerings in these domains. The sole area falling slightly short, though still very strong, is accommodation at 4.5 stars, suggesting a minor area for potential enhancement compared to its otherwise flawless performance.
This institution shows a mixed performance according to recent ratings. Its strongest areas are **Student Life** (3.0), followed by **Internationality** (2.5). Conversely, **Accomodation** (2.0) and **Value** (2.25) represent the weakest aspects. Facilities, Professors, and Location all received a middling 2.75.
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
All 21 reviews are positive, averaging 4.76/5 stars. Students frequently praised helpful teachers, strong academic support, and good facilities. Some also highlighted a positive transition experience and newfound confidence.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (around 99%), with students praising knowledgeable tutors, accessible online course content, and a great campus experience. A single negative review cited concerns about university management and cultural issues.
With a 4.81 average rating from 27 reviews, ~100% of students reported positive experiences. Recurring themes include engaging modules, knowledgeable and supportive staff, and strong employability prospects.
All five reviews are positive, with students praising supportive staff and departments, smooth application processes, and helpful career coaching. Resources like a large library and advance module content are also highlighted.
Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Key highlights include excellent tutors, engaging daily webinars, and improved trading profitability. Students appreciated the supportive learning environment that clarified market understanding.
University student reviews are mixed, with an average rating of 3/5. While one review is positive, another 25% expressed negative sentiment.
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
Nothing to show
I just saw this link on the Surrey alumnis page. I thought it was really cool to have the opportunity to share my experience. Congratulations Eduopinions for the work. I studied in Surrey a few years ago, I graduated in 2000 and I think the university has changed a lot since then. However, I can say that I loved studying in Surrey and that my daughter is now studying there too!
Nothing to show
It’s a good place to study with lots of activities to do do and with a lot of useful resources as they have a 4 floor library which is great to find studies or even a quite place to study. The modules are set out perfectly with all the content already put up in advance for the students to have a look at so that they can study in advance and have a look through before lessons.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
