IÉSEG School of Management vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs Audencia Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie
Side-by-side comparison from 538 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical and international programs with diverse students
- +Valuable professional experience through internships and work-study
- +Supportive environment for personal and professional development
- +Practical, career-focused programs and in-demand skills acquisition
- +Valuable international experiences and diverse student communities
- +Supportive professors and excellent infrastructure
- +High-quality faculty and well-designed academic programs
- +Diverse international student community and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and desirable city location for students
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +High-quality teaching from professors and speakers
- +International environment and student diversity
- +Practical curriculum and preparation for professional challenges
- +Engaging learning environment and quality education
- +Supportive and accessible staff and professors
- +Valuable internship and growth opportunities
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Lack of practical value and shallow content in courses.
- -Unfair and frustrating grading, especially for group projects.
- -Disappointing professor engagement and program support.
- -Poor management and administrative issues.
- -Ineffective communication and guidance.
- -Concerns about teaching quality and faculty understanding of student needs.
- -Ineffective teaching methods and lack of practical training.
- -Unresponsive and critical professors.
- -Limited opportunities for student interaction and networking.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Superficial academic content lacking depth and practical value
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient internship/apprenticeship support
- -Courses not aligning with student expectations or desired specializations
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common complaints.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders academic success.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in its internationality and location, both scoring above 4.5. Student life and value also received positive marks, exceeding 4.2 and 4.4 respectively. However, accommodation presents as the weakest area, with the lowest rating of approximately 3.94. Facilities and professors also received solid, though slightly lower, scores in comparison.
The university demonstrates notable strengths in its professors, internationality, and facilities, all receiving scores above 4.2. Student life and value for money also score positively. Accommodation stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating. Location also received a respectable score.
An overview of the university's ratings reveals several strengths. Notably, Internationality stands out with the highest score, indicating a particularly welcoming and diverse environment. Professors and Value also received high marks, suggesting strong academic instruction and a good return on investment. On the other hand, Accomodation received the lowest rating, pointing to a potential area for improvement. Facilities and Student Life also scored moderately.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This university exhibits a generally positive rating profile. Its strongest areas are Internationality, closely followed by Student Life and Location, all receiving high scores above 4.2. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest category, with the lowest rating of 3.61. Other aspects like Facilities, Professors, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating areas of consistent, good performance.
This institution garners excellent marks across a broad spectrum of evaluations. Professors receive perfect scores, reflecting exceptional teaching quality. Facilities, location, accommodation, and internationality are all highly rated at 4.5. Student life, while still strong at 4, is the comparatively lowest-rated area. Overall, the university presents a very positive and well-rounded picture for prospective students.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
The vast majority of university students have a positive experience, highlighting academic rigor, practical learning, and international environments. A small fraction of reviews mention disappointment with course content and grading.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback from 152 reviews highlights practical, career-focused courses, international opportunities, and strong academic/career support. Negative comments (~2.6%) mention poor communication, program disorganization, and concerns about management.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, approximately 95% of reviews are positive. Students praise the learning environment, good installations, and the city. A small percentage of feedback (~5%) mentions disappointment with theoretical classes and professor availability.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Most reviews are positive (~86%), praising teaching quality, cultural diversity, and modern infrastructure. A small number (~5%) mention superficial subject coverage or lack of practical value.
With an average rating of 5/5 and 100% positive feedback, students highlight abundant growth opportunities, quality education, and exceptional teaching methods. They also appreciate the welcoming atmosphere, accessibility of staff, and valuable internship experiences.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I have been quite satisfied by the quality of teaching at Audencia. The lecturers and professors are knowledgeable and place an emphasis on professionalism and leveraging culture in business dealings.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
