IÉSEG School of Management vs Rennes School of Business vs SKEMA Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 548 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, business-focused education with experienced professors
- +Diverse and inclusive international community and learning environment
- +Excellent academic quality and supportive facilities
- +Diverse international environment and cross-cultural exposure
- +Strong practical and career-focused business education
- +Opportunities for international experience and professional development
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international opportunities
- +High-quality teaching and practical curriculum
- +Strong alumni network and engaging student experience
- +High-quality education with specialized pathways and practical application
- +Supportive community and vibrant campus life with numerous activities
- +Strong industry connections and opportunities for real-world experience
- +Career-oriented programs and professional focus
- +Multicultural and international environment
- +Modern facilities and relevant courses
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues are prevalent and unhelpful.
- -Poor English communication and resources are a significant barrier for international students.
- -Professors' English proficiency is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and exam/result management.
- -Lack of student guidance for career goals and perceived focus on profit over education.
- -Disorganized programs and overwhelming course loads with varied evaluation methods.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and insufficient career support
- -Misalignment between program focus and student expectations
- -Poor quality of teaching and irrelevant course content.
- -Significant organizational and administrative problems.
- -High cost with little perceived value.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources were a common complaint.
- -The curriculum lacked practical relevance and current industry updates.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Student life and internationality stand out as the university's strongest aspects, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and location also received very favorable reviews. Accommodation emerged as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.76, though overall value and facilities were rated well above average.
Assessing the university reveals a generally positive reception. **Internationality** stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by **Professors**. Conversely, **Accommodations** received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other categories like Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value all fall within a solid range, suggesting a well-rounded experience with specific strengths and a notable opportunity for enhancement.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving high marks. **Student Life** also scores very well, indicating a vibrant campus environment. Conversely, **Accommodations** emerge as the lowest-rated aspect, suggesting room for improvement in this area. Other categories, including **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value**, fall within a solid, positive range.
Overall, this institution receives a balanced set of ratings. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.16) and **Student Life** (4.11), indicating positive student experiences in these regards. **Accomodation**, however, presents the weakest point at 3.37. Ratings for Facilities, Professors, and Internationality fall within a mid-to-high range, suggesting generally satisfactory performance across these aspects.
This university garners excellent marks for its facilities and location, both receiving near-perfect scores. Student life, accommodation, and value for money are rated solidly at 4.0. Professors and internationality are also well-regarded, averaging 4.2. Overall, the university demonstrates a strong performance, with its physical environment and accessibility standing out as its most impressive attributes.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong teaching methods, practical learning, and global faculty. A small amount of negative feedback concerns administrative support and language accessibility for international students.
Over 90% of reviews are positive, praising the multidisciplinary education, international environment, and career opportunities. A small percentage of feedback noted issues with management, communication, and program organization.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
~87% of reviews are positive, highlighting multiculturalism, quality teaching, and a strong alumni network. Some negative feedback (~5%) mentions superficial course content and a lack of practical value.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting good knowledge transfer, practical experience, and vibrant campus life. Just ~7.4% of feedback is negative, citing unprepared professors and organizational issues.
Most reviews (80%) are positive, praising career-oriented programs and professors. A small portion of feedback (10%) highlights administrative management issues. The average rating is 4/5.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The school stands out as an exemplary institution with commendable features. The accommodation facilities are not only comfortable but also designed to foster a conducive learning environment. The faculty comprises diverse, highly qualified educators, ensuring a high standard of education. The emphasis on practical learning prepares students effectively for real-world scenarios. The institution offers a top-notch academic experience combined with excellent living standards, making it a highly recommended choice for those seeking quality education.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
We were promised good internship programs, however we are left to fend for ourselves where we have to find everything on our own with little to no guidance from the bigger authorities. A little disappointing
