Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs Lahore College for Women University - LCWU vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Beaconhouse National University vs Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS

Side-by-side comparison from 56 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore College for Women University - LCWU: wins 1/4 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 2/4 categories
Beaconhouse National University: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/4 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/4 categories
Lahore Leads University: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Botany
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
3.80
4.50
4.50
3.00
4.00
3.00
Location
4.50
4.60
Win
4.00
3.71
2.50
3.67
3.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
5.00
Win
4.38
4.00
3.67
4.00
Internationality
3.60
4.00
4.00
2.88
5.00
Win
3.33
1.00
Student life
4.58
4.20
5.00
4.63
5.00
3.67
3.00
Value
4.17
4.00
4.50
Win
4.13
4.00
3.67
4.00
Accommodation
3.76
3.67
4.00
3.00
3.00
4.00
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Strong academic programs and engaging, practical teaching
  • +Supportive and approachable faculty and staff
  • +Safe and well-equipped learning environment
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Supportive and judgment-free faculty fostering practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus environment with diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Emphasis on academic growth and personal development opportunities
  • +Excellent reputation and program variety
  • +Strong accounting, law, engineering, and computer science offerings
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Lack of resources and connections for research in science departments.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Course content is often irrelevant or poorly delivered.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

The university excels particularly in its **location**, receiving a strong 4.6 rating. Student life, internationality, and professor quality are also well-regarded, all scoring a solid 4. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities (3.8) and accommodation (3.67). Overall, value is rated highly at 4.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.5. Its professors and value for money also received solid ratings. However, accommodation and internationality are notable areas for improvement, with scores significantly lower than other categories. Location also received a moderate rating.

This institution excels in student life and internationality, both scoring a perfect 5. Professors also received strong marks with a 4. Conversely, the location is identified as a weaker area, receiving a 2.5. Facilities and accommodation are rated moderately at 3, while value for money is also a positive aspect with a 4.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

With an average rating of 3.5/5, roughly 67% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, approachable professors, and engaging classes. Approximately 17% of feedback is negative, with one mention of issues in the science department's research support.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight positive academic growth, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and a vibrant campus environment with ample extracurricular activities.

The sole review is highly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It praises the university as one of the best in Pakistan, highlighting its diverse program offerings in fields like accounting, law, engineering, and computer science.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
57%
0%
100%
25%
100%
67%
0%
4★
31%
67%
0%
75%
0%
33%
0%
3★
11%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
2★
0%
17%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close