Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS vs University of Management and Technology - UMT vs Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD vs Beaconhouse National University vs Skans School of Accountancy - Nil

Side-by-side comparison from 67 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Lahore University of Management Sciences - LUMS: wins 1/3 categories
University of Management and Technology - UMT: wins 0/3 categories
Pakistan Institute of Fashion and Design - PIFD: wins 0/3 categories
Beaconhouse National University: wins 0/3 categories
Skans School of Accountancy - Nil: wins 0/3 categories
Rashid Latif Medical College: wins 0/3 categories
Minhaj University Lahore - MUL: wins 2/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Economics
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Fashion
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
Best programme: Education in Educational Leadership
Category ratings
Facilities
4.44
3.56
4.50
4.50
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Location
4.50
Win
3.39
4.00
3.71
3.67
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
5.00
4.38
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
3.60
3.50
4.00
2.88
3.33
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.58
3.56
5.00
4.63
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Value
4.17
3.89
4.50
4.13
3.67
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.76
3.22
4.00
3.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Critical thinking and intellectual freedom
  • +Rigorous academics and competitive environment
  • +Supportive faculty and comprehensive programmes
  • +Diverse programs and dedicated, approachable faculty
  • +Engaging campus life and student support
  • +Holistic development and transformative experiences
  • +Supportive and inclusive environment with excellent learning opportunities
  • +Highly valued graduates in the market
  • +Top choice for fashion design and related programs
  • +Supportive and judgment-free faculty fostering practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus environment with diverse extracurricular activities
  • +Emphasis on academic growth and personal development opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable and passionate instructors
  • +Suitable program recommendations
  • +Professional environment

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and research focus
  • +Well-structured classes and available resources
  • +Quality education in a friendly environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause a lack of action on student requests.
  • -Frequent and unjustified fee increases are a major concern.
  • -Some teachers lack fundamental subject knowledge.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Facilities are outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are lacking or unengaging.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of engagement and ineffective teaching methods are disappointing.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to frustration.

Nothing to show

  • -Overcrowded and undersized classrooms.
  • -Lack of timely and effective communication from administration.
  • -Inadequate resources and outdated technology.
Rating summary
What students say

With impressive scores in several areas, this institution excels particularly in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving marks above 4.5. **Facilities** also score highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** are the areas needing the most improvement, with ratings of 3.76 and 3.6 respectively. **Professors** and **Value** fall comfortably in the middle range of the provided data.

This institution shows its strongest performance in value for money, alongside positive ratings for professors and student life. Facilities and internationality also receive solid scores. However, areas such as location and accommodation fall slightly below the average, indicating potential for improvement in these aspects.

This institution garners excellent scores in several key areas, notably achieving perfect marks for its professors and student life. Facilities and value for money are also highly regarded. The university presents a solid offering in terms of accommodation and internationality, though its location, while good, is rated slightly lower than other aspects.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life and facilities, both scoring above 4.5. Its professors and value for money also received solid ratings. However, accommodation and internationality are notable areas for improvement, with scores significantly lower than other categories. Location also received a moderate rating.

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities and accommodation, both receiving high marks. Its location, student life, and value for money are also well-regarded, averaging a solid 3.67. The weakest area identified is internationality, which scores slightly lower than other aspects. Overall, the university presents a generally positive profile with specific areas of excellence.

Nothing to show

This institution garners outstanding marks across several key aspects. Its strongest areas are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly rated at 4. The weakest area, though still strong, is facilities, while value is a standout positive at 5.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nearly all (91%) student reviews praise LUMS for its transformative education, critical thinking encouragement, and supportive faculty. Students value the demanding academics and diverse campus community, finding the experience rewarding despite challenges. No negative feedback was recorded.

Most students (~74%) report a vibrant atmosphere with dedicated faculty, diverse programs, and engaging campus life. A small percentage (~11%) noted issues with subject teacher knowledge and administrative management.

With an average rating of 5/5, ~100% of reviews are positive. Students highly recommend the university for fashion programs, citing supportive staff and excellent learning opportunities that lead to market-valued graduates.

All eight reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight positive academic growth, knowledgeable and supportive faculty, and a vibrant campus environment with ample extracurricular activities.

With a high average rating of 4.67/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students praise professors' strong subject knowledge and passion, and appreciate personalized program recommendations that align with budget and facilities.

Nothing to show

With a 5/5 average rating, all feedback is positive. This single review highlights supportive professors, well-structured classes, and sufficient campus resources, creating a quality, research-focused environment.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
33%
100%
25%
67%
0%
100%
4★
31%
33%
0%
75%
33%
0%
0%
3★
11%
22%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Doctor Of Pharmacy

I think UMT provides a good learning environment with modern facilities and a strong focus on professional development. The faculty is supportive, and there are plenty of opportunities for growth. However, the fee structure can be a bit high for some students.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close