Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas vs SKEMA Business School vs Petrópolis Faculty of Medicine vs Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis vs Ecole Intuit Lab

Side-by-side comparison from 143 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: SKEMA Business School (4.40)
Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais - PUC Minas: wins 5/7 categories
SKEMA Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Petrópolis Faculty of Medicine: wins 1/7 categories
Universidade Federal de Rondonópolis: wins 0/7 categories
Ecole Intuit Lab: wins 0/7 categories
Universidade Católica de Petrópolis: wins 0/7 categories
Faculdade de Educação Tecnológica do Estado do Rio de Janeiro - FAETERJ: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Economics
4.40
Top
Read more reviews
133 reviews
×
Best programme: Supply Chain Management
Best programme: Medicine
Marseille, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Information Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.67
Win
4.20
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Location
4.50
4.24
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Professors
4.50
Win
4.41
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.17
4.36
Win
3.95
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Student life
4.40
Win
4.10
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Value
4.50
Win
4.04
3.45
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
3.00
Accommodation
4.20
Win
3.56
1.55
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and comprehensive curriculum
  • +Strong market preparation and multicultural insights
  • +Good infrastructure and organized institution
  • +International focus and diverse campus experiences
  • +Practical, industry-relevant curriculum and career support
  • +Strong community with great classmates and alumni network
  • +Approachable and qualified faculty
  • +Diverse project and internship opportunities
  • +Beautiful campus environment

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • +High-quality, concise programs
  • +Relevant and up-to-date content
  • +Strong foundational direction
Cons
  • -Overcrowded and outdated facilities.
  • -Lack of communication from administration and disorganized management.
  • -Limited course offerings and outdated curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues create poor student experience.
  • -Ineffective communication and guidance hinder career development.
  • -Faculty and program organization are disappointing and overly focused on profit.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Inconsistent or poor quality of teaching and curriculum are common complaints.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and a lack of support create frustration.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
  • -The curriculum lacks practical application and relevance to current industry needs.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution scores particularly well in its **facilities**, achieving an impressive 4.67. **Professors**, **location**, and **value** also stand out with strong marks of 4.5. The **student life** is rated positively at 4.4. Among the surveyed areas, **internationality** at 4.17 and **accommodation** at 4.2 received the lowest, though still respectable, scores.

Across a range of metrics, this institution demonstrates considerable strengths, particularly in its **professors** (4.41) and **internationality** (4.36). Facilities and location also received favorable scores, both above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating a generally positive experience. The weakest area is **accommodation**, which stands at 3.56, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **location**, achieving a perfect score. Its **facilities**, **professors**, and **student life** also receive solid marks, all rated at 4. A significant area for improvement, however, is **accommodation**, which received a considerably lower rating. **Internationality** and **value** present moderate scores, suggesting room for growth in these aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

With a generally moderate overall performance, the university's strengths lie in its **Professors**, receiving a commendable rating of 4. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** stand out as weaker areas, both rated at 2. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value all received a score of 3, indicating a more consistent, middle-ground performance in these aspects.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.29/5, ~71% of feedback is positive, praising excellent professors, good infrastructure, and comprehensive programs. A small portion of feedback noted minor imperfections in technological features and graduation program structure.

The vast majority (~97%) of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and strong alumni networks. A small percentage (~3%) express concerns about management, communication, and organization.

With two positive reviews and an average rating of 4/5, feedback highlights numerous project opportunities and approachable, qualified professors. Students also appreciate early internships.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This university garners strong positive feedback, with its ~100% of positive reviews leading to an average rating of 4/5. Reviews highlight well-regarded programs, though some suggest a need for updated content in areas like AI.

Rating distribution
5★
57%
49%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
14%
42%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
3★
29%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Experience in School

My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close