SKEMA Business School vs Hult International Business School vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs Zayed University vs Ascencia Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 297 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
SKEMA Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Hult International Business School: wins 1/7 categories
EM Normandie - EM Normandie: wins 0/7 categories
Zayed University: wins 0/7 categories
Ascencia Business School: wins 0/7 categories
Middlesex University Dubai - MDX Dubai: wins 1/7 categories
TETR College of Business: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Business Administration
London, The United Kingdom
4.30
Read more reviews
65 reviews
×
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: MSc International Logistics and Port Management
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
4.30
Read more reviews
24 reviews
×
Best programme: Public Health
Best programme: Business Administration
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
4.10
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting and Finance
New York City, United States
4.40
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Management & Technology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.23
4.07
4.22
4.43
3.20
4.00
4.50
Win
Location
4.32
4.52
3.89
4.13
4.20
4.15
4.75
Win
Professors
4.37
4.41
4.11
4.46
4.20
4.50
Win
4.40
Internationality
4.43
4.71
Win
4.22
4.25
3.80
4.50
4.60
Student life
4.25
4.13
3.78
4.35
2.80
4.00
4.50
Win
Value
4.09
4.08
4.00
4.38
4.00
3.93
4.40
Win
Accommodation
3.70
3.21
3.75
4.32
3.00
3.54
4.33
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world business application
  • +International environment and diverse experiences
  • +Career development and professional growth
  • +Strong career services and networking opportunities
  • +Practical, hands-on learning with experienced faculty
  • +Diverse international environment and global alumni network
  • +Practical, industry-relevant programmes
  • +International environment and global opportunities
  • +Inspiring professors and strong teaching quality
  • +Exceptional faculty and academic programs
  • +Outstanding facilities and campus environment
  • +Strong preparation for the workforce
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable lecturers, with practical and theoretical knowledge.
  • +Supportive learning environment and engaging discussions with diverse peers.
  • +Easy access to materials and responsive faculty.
  • +Engaging and knowledgeable instructors
  • +Supportive community and approachable staff
  • +Relevant industry connections and practical learning
  • +Experiential learning and business creation
  • +Industry leader insights and networking opportunities
  • +Diverse international environment and impactful outcomes
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues
  • -Poor communication and guidance
  • -Outdated facilities and teaching faculty
  • -Administrative and management issues are prevalent.
  • -Facility quality and professor standards are inconsistent.
  • -Admission standards are perceived as too low.
  • -Mediocre teaching and perceived lack of educational value.
  • -The institution feels like a money-making scheme rather than a place of learning.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a recurring problem.
  • -Poor communication from the institution is a significant source of dissatisfaction.
  • -Unresponsive and unhelpful administrative and management staff.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including technology.
  • -Lack of relevant curriculum and insufficient career preparation.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources frustrate students.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues create confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Limited career support and unclear pathways hinder future prospects.
  • -Disorganized and unresponsive administration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities.
  • -Unengaging and ineffective teaching methods.
Rating summary
What students say

Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates robust strengths in **Internationality (4.43)** and **Professors (4.37)**. Student life, location, and facilities also received positive scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at **3.70**, suggesting potential room for improvement in that specific aspect. The overall value is also rated favorably at 4.09.

This university garners impressive scores, particularly in **Internationality** (4.77) and **Location** (4.58). Professors also receive high marks at 4.47. Facilities, Student Life, and Value are all rated favorably above 4.0. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, scoring significantly lower at 3.25, indicating a potential area for improvement.

This university achieves excellent scores in its facilities and internationality, both receiving a 4.22 rating. Professors are also highly regarded with a 4.11 score. Value for money is rated a solid 4. The weakest areas appear to be student life and accommodation, with ratings of 3.78 and 3.75 respectively, suggesting room for improvement in these aspects.

This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in its **Professors**, earning a rating of 4.46, closely followed by **Facilities** at 4.43 and **Value** at 4.38. **Student Life** also scores well with 4.35. The **Location** receives the lowest rating at 4.13, while other aspects like Accomodation and Internationality are also solid.

The university demonstrates significant strengths in its **Professors** and **Location**, both scoring 4.2. **Value** also received a high rating of 4. Conversely, **Student Life** stands out as the weakest area with a score of 2.8. Other categories like Facilities, Accomodation, and Internationality fall within the mid-range, suggesting areas for potential improvement.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its professors and internationality, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also appreciate the location with a rating of 4.15. The weakest area appears to be accommodation, which received a 3.54 rating. Facilities and student life both earned a solid 4, while value for money sits at a respectable 3.93.

This institution garners strong overall evaluations, with location standing out as the highest-rated aspect at 4.67. Accommodations and internationality also received excellent scores of 4.5. Areas demonstrating solid performance include facilities and student life, both at 4.33, alongside value and professors, which are rated at 4.25.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.37/5 average rating from 175 reviews, approximately 97.7% of students provide positive feedback. Key highlights include practical skills, international opportunities, and professional development. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions poor management and organization.

Approximately 95.4% of 65 reviews are positive, highlighting networking, job opportunities, practical learning, and supportive faculty. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with staff competence and course materials.

About 78% of reviews are positive, highlighting academic and professional growth, practical application of knowledge, and an international environment. A single negative review criticized the institution as a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.

Zayed University receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise exceptional academic programs, knowledgeable faculty, and outstanding facilities. Minor concerns are virtually absent.

With an average rating of 4.2/5, ~80% of reviews are positive, highlighting exceptional education, supportive faculty, and a rewarding learning experience. Convenience with materials and approachable lecturers are frequently praised. No negative reviews were provided.

With a strong average rating of 4.14/5 from 14 reviews, students praise engaging lecturers and flexible learning modes. Supportive faculty, industry connections, and a diverse community are recurring themes. There is no negative feedback.

With an average rating of 4.4/5 from 5 reviews, students are highly satisfied. Recurring positive themes include practical, hands-on learning experiences and valuable networking opportunities. A minimal amount of feedback noted occasional scheduling issues with tutoring.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
52%
44%
33%
40%
29%
60%
4★
41%
29%
33%
63%
40%
57%
20%
3★
7%
14%
11%
4%
20%
14%
20%
2★
1%
2%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
1%
3%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Class of 2018, Int'l Business Administration

Studying at Skema Business School in Sophia Antipolis was a fantastic experience. The campus is modern and located in a wonderful tech hub. The professors bring real-world business experience to the classroom. I loved the multicultural environment and the group projects. Skema gave me great friends, a strong global network, and the right skills for my career.

DIVERSITY

One of my favourite aspects about Hult is its diversity. By meeting people from all over the world with diverse histories and customs, you can get a sense of what their home nations are like. I also enjoy the help the staff provides every step of the way.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Personal university Review

I must admit at first it was a bit hard and confusing, having good lecturers helped a lot with my studying journey and I was able to contact the after the lecture. Accessing the materials and student portal was easy, convenient and up to date. Very happy with my experience.

Nothing to show

Loving it here!

Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close