Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC vs Ecole Centrale de Nantes vs Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC vs Federal University of Technology Akure vs University of the Philippines Visayas - UPV

Side-by-side comparison from 77 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Arellano University - AU - ABC (4.80)
Universidad Cooperativa de Colombia - UCC: wins 0/6 categories
Ecole Centrale de Nantes: wins 2/6 categories
Ovidius University of Constanta - UOC: wins 0/6 categories
Federal University of Technology Akure: wins 0/6 categories
University of the Philippines Visayas - UPV: wins 2/6 categories
Arellano University - AU - ABC: wins 2/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: General Medicine
Best programme: Engineering
Best programme: American Studies
Best programme: Mechanical Engineering
Best programme: BSc Psychology
Pasig City, Philippines
4.80
Top
Read more reviews
5 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of Tourism Management
Category ratings
Facilities
4.50
4.67
Win
3.38
3.74
4.00
4.20
Location
4.50
4.00
4.40
4.21
4.67
Win
4.25
Professors
4.63
4.67
3.83
4.26
4.67
4.60
Internationality
3.88
4.67
Win
3.88
3.72
4.00
4.40
Student life
4.00
4.33
3.33
3.84
4.33
4.60
Win
Value
4.63
4.33
3.68
4.33
5.00
Win
4.40
Accommodation
4.00
3.67
3.23
3.88
4.00
4.40
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Strong social and community focus
  • +Early patient contact and practical skill development
  • +Student voice and equitable treatment
  • +Strong engineering curriculum and practical application focus.
  • +Knowledgeable, supportive, and approachable professors.
  • +Excellent hands-on learning opportunities and advanced facilities.
  • +Knowledgeable & supportive faculty
  • +Comprehensive & challenging curriculum
  • +Extensive resources & facilities
  • +Strong academic programs and technical expertise development
  • +Focus on self-reliance, discipline, and practical learning
  • +Vibrant campus life and collaborative peer environment
  • +Excellent quality of education and highly qualified professors
  • +Transformative personal development
  • +Specialized excellence in fisheries science
  • +Supportive teachers and personal growth
  • +Engaging events, organizations, and community
  • +Affordable tuition and quality facilities
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are a major concern.
  • -Communication and organization are frequently criticized as poor.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning and comfort.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a persistent problem.
  • -Disregard and lack of student value.
  • -Limited extracurricular opportunities.
  • -Corruption within the system.
  • -Administrative and management issues are frequently mentioned.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a common complaint.
  • -There are consistent criticisms regarding course content and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -The curriculum often feels irrelevant and fails to prepare students for the real world.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are a significant drawback.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are frequently criticized as ineffective.
Rating summary
What students say

Overall, the university receives commendable ratings. Its strongest areas are Facilities and Professors, both scoring 4.5 and 4.625 respectively, closely followed by Location and Value. Student Life and Accomodation are rated well at 4. The university's weakest area is Internationality, with a score of 3.875, though this still indicates a generally positive reception.

This institution receives strong accolades for its Facilities, Professors, and Internationality, all scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life and Value are also highly rated at 4.33. The University's Location garners a solid 4. However, Accomodation stands out as the area with the lowest score, receiving a 3.67 rating.

Location stands out as the university's strongest asset, receiving a high rating. Conversely, accommodation presents the weakest area, with the lowest score. Other categories like professors and internationality also performed well. Student life and facilities received moderate ratings, indicating areas for potential improvement. The overall value is considered good.

Academic and financial aspects of this institution are particularly well-regarded. Value stands out with the highest rating, closely followed by professors and location. Student life and accommodation also score favorably. Facilities represent the area with the lowest score, though still within a generally positive range. Internationality is also rated moderately.

Across several key areas, this institution demonstrates notable strengths, particularly in its **Value**, receiving a perfect score. Professors and Location are also highly regarded, both scoring an impressive 4.67. Student Life also garners a strong rating of 4.33. Facilities and Accommodation are rated a solid 4, while Internationality is also deemed satisfactory.

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its academic and social offerings, with Professors and Student Life both achieving a high 4.6 rating. Facilities and Location are also well-regarded at 4.2 and 4.25 respectively. Accomodation, Internationality, and Value are solid performers, each receiving a 4.4. Overall, the university presents a very positive picture with no significantly weak areas identified.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.56/5. Students highlight meaningful experiences, practical patient contact, and a strong social focus. Some mention timetable distribution issues.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight the rigorous engineering curriculum, hands-on learning, and knowledgeable, supportive professors. Limited accommodation is a minor drawback.

With an average rating of 3.75/5, ~75% of university student reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable faculty, comprehensive curriculum, and extensive resources. Approximately 25% of feedback is negative, citing poor student treatment and limited extracurricular opportunities.

Approximately 96% of 53 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.25/5. Students highlight strong academic programs, dedicated faculty, practical learning opportunities, and vibrant campus life. A minor point of concern was occasional resource inadequacy.

University of the Philippines Visayas receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise excellent education quality and professors' expertise, particularly in fisheries science. The campus environment is also noted as exceptional.

All five reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.8/5. Students praise learning, personal growth, dedicated teachers, and modern facilities. Vibrant community, events, and organizations are also frequently mentioned.

Rating distribution
5★
56%
33%
50%
43%
67%
80%
4★
44%
67%
0%
38%
33%
20%
3★
0%
0%
25%
19%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The best Federal University of Technology in Nigeria.

The Federal University of Technology, Akure (FUTA) is the best Federal University of Technology in Nigeria. Her stable academic calendar, dedicated staffs and technology advancement made her stood out among the other Federal University of Technology. The school motto is "Technology for Self Reliance" and you can rest assured that you are going places after passing through the school.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close