Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University
Side-by-side comparison from 168 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Practical knowledge and real-world application
- +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
- +Strong student support and well-structured courses
- +Strong academic programmes and learning support
- +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
- +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
- +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
- +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
- +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Practical and theoretical course balance
- +Approachable, experienced faculty
- +Supportive, multicultural community
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Friendly, diverse, and international student community
- +Numerous opportunities for personal and academic development
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
- -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
- -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
- -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
- -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
- -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
- -There are frequent concerns about curriculum relevance and teaching quality.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.
Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.
The university receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.62. **Location** also stands out at 4.42, followed closely by **Value** at 4.27. The institution maintains strong performance in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both around 4.2. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.04. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Student Life**, scoring 3.88.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting supportive professors, a friendly atmosphere, and opportunities for networking and personal development. No negative feedback was reported.
Nothing to show
The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
Nothing to show
My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.
My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.
