Central European University - CEU vs Budapest Business University - BBU vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs Budapest Metropolitan University

Side-by-side comparison from 112 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Central European University - CEU: wins 1/7 categories
Budapest Business University - BBU: wins 0/7 categories
University of Szeged: wins 2/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 0/7 categories
Budapest Metropolitan University: wins 0/7 categories
Wekerle International University: wins 1/7 categories
University of Pécs Faculty of Business and Economics: wins 3/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Best programme: Tourism and Catering
Szeged, Hungary
4.40
Read more reviews
19 reviews
×
Best programme: Agricultural Engineering
Best programme: Programme Grande Ecole (PGE)
Best programme: Animation
Best programme: MBA
Best programme: BSc Business Administration & Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
3.79
4.00
3.81
3.33
4.00
4.20
Win
Location
3.44
4.05
4.29
4.17
3.33
5.00
Win
4.42
Professors
4.22
3.89
4.32
Win
3.94
3.67
4.00
4.23
Internationality
4.78
Win
3.95
4.26
3.88
4.00
4.00
4.62
Student life
4.00
3.63
4.47
Win
4.13
3.00
4.00
3.88
Value
3.78
3.89
4.16
3.75
3.33
4.00
4.27
Win
Accommodation
3.75
3.37
3.74
3.41
3.00
3.00
4.04
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Practical knowledge and real-world application
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Strong student support and well-structured courses
  • +Strong academic programmes and learning support
  • +Approachable and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive international student environment
  • +Strong academic programs with international focus and practical experience.
  • +Approachable and supportive teachers fostering a positive learning environment.
  • +Vibrant campus life and opportunities for personal and professional growth.
  • +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
  • +Modern, open-minded environment
  • +Friendly, international learning environment
  • +Supportive professors, practical business concepts
  • +Organized classes, useful study materials
  • +Supportive and helpful professors
  • +Friendly, diverse, and international student community
  • +Numerous opportunities for personal and academic development
Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Poor communication and administrative issues.
  • -Unprofessional teaching staff and language barriers.
  • -Disorganized structure and struggles with course registration.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration and inefficiency.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Poor communication and lack of transparency cause confusion and dissatisfaction.
  • -Ineffective and unprepared professors with poor language skills.
  • -Poor organization and irrelevant, expensive courses.
  • -Lack of student engagement and focus on partying.
  • -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -There are frequent concerns about curriculum relevance and teaching quality.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

This university garners a strong overall rating, with Location emerging as its most celebrated aspect. Professors and Value are also highly regarded. Conversely, Accomodation received the lowest score. Student Life and Facilities are mid-range, while Internationality is also a notable strength. The university presents a generally positive picture, with distinct areas of excellence and areas for potential improvement.

Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across several key areas. Student Life is a clear standout, achieving the highest rating. Professors and Internationality also receive strong marks. However, Accommodations present the weakest area, with a comparatively lower score. Facilities, Location, and Value fall within the generally positive range.

Evaluations reveal a university with particularly strong offerings in **location** and **student life**, both exceeding a 4.1 rating. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower at 3.41. Other aspects like professors, facilities, internationality, and value fall within a solid mid-to-high range, generally between 3.75 and 3.94.

This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.

Overall, this institution demonstrates a solid performance across multiple facets of student experience. Its location receives the highest mark, a testament to its desirable setting. Conversely, accommodation stands out as the weakest area, suggesting potential room for improvement in this regard. Other aspects like facilities, professors, student life, internationality, and value are all rated positively, indicating a well-rounded educational environment.

The university receives high marks in several key areas, notably excelling in **Internationality** with a rating of 4.62. **Location** also stands out at 4.42, followed closely by **Value** at 4.27. The institution maintains strong performance in **Facilities** and **Professors**, both around 4.2. **Accomodation** is rated a solid 4.04. The area receiving the lowest rating is **Student Life**, scoring 3.88.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

~57% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical knowledge and professional, up-to-date teachers. ~9.5% of feedback indicates issues with communication and organization.

University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~84% of reviews rating it 4-5 stars. Students praise the diverse faculties, excellent library, and strong support for international students. There are no 1-2 star reviews.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting enriching experiences, approachable teachers, and good knowledge transfer. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions unprepared professors and irrelevant courses.

With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.

With one review available, the university has a 4/5 average rating. The feedback highlights a friendly, international environment and supportive professors. No negative feedback was received.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~92% 4-5 stars), highlighting supportive professors, a friendly atmosphere, and opportunities for networking and personal development. No negative feedback was reported.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
29%
53%
34%
0%
0%
50%
4★
40%
29%
32%
41%
33%
100%
42%
3★
10%
33%
16%
19%
33%
0%
8%
2★
10%
5%
0%
3%
33%
0%
0%
1★
10%
5%
0%
3%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Dynamic environment and teachers

The environment is good and it’s multicultural The compound is really nice but a bit far(depending on the faculty) They should have a sports team because of the facilities that they have They should really consider the sports career of the university

Nothing to show

Well-rounded programme

Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

A Great place to learn and grow

My experience has been very positive. I particularly appreciate the supportive professors, diverse international student community, and the opportunities to develop both academically and personally. It offers a welcoming environment, and I would definitely recommend it to students looking for a quality and international study experience.

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close