Central European University - CEU vs Eötvös Loránd University - ELTE vs University of Szeged vs ESSCA School of Management vs IBS International Business School - IBS
Side-by-side comparison from 155 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Diverse student body and international perspective
- +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
- +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
- +Excellent professors and clear explanations
- +Rigorous and well-structured programs
- +Broad and interesting academic opportunities
- +Excellent and supportive faculty and staff
- +Diverse and well-structured academic programs
- +Welcoming and advantageous environment for students
- +International focus and diverse programs
- +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
- +Supportive professors and student community
- +Diverse international student body and cultural exchange
- +Practical, real-world applicable knowledge and career opportunities
- +Excellent teaching staff and flexible class schedules
- +Unique, broad, and exploratory learning approach
- +Modern, open-minded environment
- +Practical and theoretical course balance
- +Approachable, experienced faculty
- +Supportive, multicultural community
- -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
- -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning and comfort.
- -Lack of clear communication and student support creates confusion and dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources hinder learning.
- -Limited opportunities for practical experience and insufficient career support are major drawbacks.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
- -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support creates uncertainty for students.
- -Lack of practical skills and real-world application in the curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
- -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
- -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.
This university garners high marks in several key areas, with **Location** standing out as its strongest attribute at 4.63. **Internationality** and **Value** also received very favorable scores, reflecting strengths in global appeal and perceived worth. Conversely, **Accommodations** present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other categories. **Professors** and **Student Life** are rated positively, indicating solid performance in teaching and campus experience.
This institution demonstrates a strong performance across multiple aspects, with student life and professors receiving particularly high marks. While facilities and accommodation are rated well, they represent the areas with room for improvement compared to other categories. The university also scores favorably in location, internationality, and value.
The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.
This university garners impressive scores across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, followed closely by professors and value. On the other hand, location and accommodation received the lowest ratings, though still within a generally positive range. Overall, student life and facilities also scored well, contributing to a solid academic profile.
This university presents a generally positive but mixed picture. Its strongest areas include Internationality, scoring a solid 4. Professors also received a commendable rating of 3.67. Conversely, Student Life and Accommodation are its weakest points, both averaging a 3. Facilities, Location, and Value are all rated moderately at 3.33.
This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.
~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.
Most university student feedback (approximately 74%) is positive, highlighting rigorous programs, knowledgeable professors, and a good community. Some students noted minor administrative disorganization and issues with professors' English proficiency.
University of Szeged receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~83% of reviews being highly positive (4-5 stars). Students appreciate the wide range of faculties, great library, and scholarship opportunities. Teaching methodologies and supportive professors are frequently praised.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.
With a 4.53/5 average, ~95% of reviews are positive. Students praise practical knowledge, real-world problem-solving, excellent teaching staff, and a curriculum preparing them for today's world. The international environment, diverse student body, and opportunities to understand different cultures are also frequently highlighted.
With an average rating of 3/5, student feedback is mixed. Approximately 33% of reviews are negative, citing a lack of technical skills and real-world experience. Positive comments highlight the university's unique, modern, and open-minded approach.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.
Nothing to show
There is a big variety of departments to choose from, including ones that are the only available ones within the country. Unfortunately on the other hand, the organization and communication of the institution was not on the level of quality that one would expect from one of the top universities in the country. Regarding the quality of education, I had very mixed experiences as there are big differences within the departments and among the professors.
Nothing to show
ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.
- Great University. - Great support system from teachers. - You will meet different nationalities. - Recommendable to anyone. I am a Master student in International Management. This course will help you later for working in Multinationals company and also management level.
Nothing to show
My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.
