University of St. Gallen - HSG vs HEC Lausanne vs Mthashana College - MC vs Qassim University vs King Khalid University
Side-by-side comparison from 24 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive faculty and great learning opportunities
- +Stimulating environment for personal and academic growth
- +Strong reputation and career prospects
- +Academic rigor and professor quality
- +International atmosphere and diverse student body
- +School's strong reputation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Welcoming and encouraging environment for diverse interests
- +Practical, hands-on learning experiences
- +Supportive campus community
- +Practical and industry-relevant education
- +Supportive and helpful professors
- +Diverse international student body
- +Strong engineering and architecture programs
- +Good facilities and adaptive online learning
- +Caring instructors and useful practical application
- -Convoluted teaching material and low-quality content make learning difficult.
- -Administrative and management issues, including unsupportive staff and bureaucratic hurdles, cause significant delays.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -The curriculum is perceived as irrelevant and poorly structured.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Excessive administrative and communication issues are a major concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -The curriculum lacks relevance and practical application for future careers.
- -Administrative and management issues caused significant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor condition of buildings were a major concern.
- -Lack of organized support for international students was evident.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
Across surveyed categories, the university's professors received the highest rating, indicating a strong area of performance. Conversely, student life and value for money emerged as areas with the lowest scores. Facilities, accommodation, and internationality were rated moderately. Location also fell within a similar, mid-range evaluation.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its facilities, professors, student life, accommodation, and internationality, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. However, its value for money is identified as a weaker area, scoring only 2. The location received a moderate rating of 3, suggesting it's neither a significant draw nor a major drawback for students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates consistent strength across a comprehensive range of metrics. All assessed areas, including Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, Internationality, and Value, have received a uniform rating of 4 out of 5. Consequently, there are no distinct strongest or weakest areas; the university exhibits a uniformly positive and well-rounded performance.
Offering a mixed but generally positive assessment, this institution excels in **Accomodation**, receiving a high score of 4.2. Other strengths include **Professors**, **Location**, and **Internationality**, all rated at 3.8. The university's **Facilities** and **Student Life** are its weakest points, both scoring 3.2, while **Value** sits at a moderate 3.4.
This institution receives positive marks in several key areas, with **Value** standing out as its strongest point at 4.22. **Facilities** also garnered a high rating of 4.0. On the other hand, **Internationality** represents the weakest area, scoring 3.33. Other aspects like Professors, Student Life, and Accommodation fall within a moderate to good range, indicating a generally well-rounded experience.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising supportive faculty, great learning and career opportunities, and a stimulating environment. Some negative feedback mentions convoluted teaching materials and administrative issues.
One review gives a 4/5 rating, praising the academic environment and qualified professors. The demanding workload is seen as a worthwhile trade-off for the rewarding experience and international atmosphere.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4/5 average rating and ~100% positive feedback, students express pleasure and appreciation for the welcoming, practical, and hands-on learning environment. There are no negative reviews in this dataset.
With 3 out of 5 reviews being positive, students generally find the university offers practical training and helpful professors. Around 20% of feedback noted issues with course availability or administrative support.
With an average rating of 4.56/5 from 9 reviews, ~89% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong engineering programs and good facilities. A minority of reviews found the location crowded and some instructors less engaged.
A very nice college with supportive faculty and great learning opportunities. I gained a lot of knowledge, skills, and experiences that will help me in my future career.This college provides a wonderful environment for learning and growth. The faculty is supportive, the campus is vibrant, and I have learned so much academically and personally here
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I was an Erasmus Student at this University(Banky faculty) in spring semester 19/20. It was the worst Erasmus ever. Only 4/9 subjects which I choose in my Learning Agreement existed in the Neptun system( which is compulsory for every student). So I had only 8/30 ECTS in the first week. Firstly, the coordinators answered my e-mails, but it wasn’t so useful, because they only said: “everything is good don’t mind we will fix it”. (If you try to choose another subject from the “subjects list for Erasmus student” (which is on official page) be ready, that 85% of subjects don’t exist in Neptun or don’t have any places for you. ) After 10000 e-mails with asking for help, they stopped responding to me. It was already the end of the second week of studying when I realize that nothing will change and I couldn’t reach the necessary 30ECTS. I had to return to my home Uni not to miss this semester. I don’t know who is responsible for this situation and I don’t wish anyone to be in my place. So... if you want to spoil your Erasmus, waste money, time and Nerves then go to Obuda University.
Nothing to show
