Université de Montréal vs HEC Montreal vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Cargair Flight Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and challenging coursework
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Accessible degree pathways with flexible entry requirements
- +Rigorous, career-focused programs with strong industry connections
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world project opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
- +Supportive instructors from industry
- +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in course content.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life and value stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving scores above 4.5. Location represents the weakest area, though still rated favorably at over 4.0. Facilities, professors, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.
Most students praise rigorous, career-focused programs that prepare them for the job market and offer practical learning. Excellent faculty and industry connections are recurring themes, with ~0% negative feedback.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.
Nothing to show
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
