Université de Montréal vs HEC Montreal vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Greystone College vs Cargair Flight Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 80 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and knowledgeable professors
- +Diverse and challenging coursework
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Accessible degree pathways with flexible entry requirements
- +Rigorous, career-focused programs with strong industry connections
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world project opportunities
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
- +Effective teaching and supportive professors
- +Comprehensive programs and extra learning materials
- +Excellent staff support and professional development preparation
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
- +Supportive instructors from industry
- +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inefficiency.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support leaves students feeling lost.
- -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of practical application and relevance in course content.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
- -Disorganized program and entry-level content.
- -Low academic rigor and lack of depth.
- -Basic English level not ideal for advanced learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
- -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Evaluations indicate a generally positive university experience. Facilities and Professors received the highest marks, with strong scores also noted for Location and Value. Student Life and Internationality also performed well. Accommodations stand out as the lowest-rated area, though still receiving a respectable score. Overall, the university presents a solid offering across most aspects of student life and academics.
Overall, this university garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Student life and value stand out as the strongest areas, both receiving scores above 4.5. Location represents the weakest area, though still rated favorably at over 4.0. Facilities, professors, and internationality are also strong points, all scoring above 4.4, indicating a well-rounded educational experience.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
This university garners top marks in several key areas, notably **Location** and **Student Life**, both receiving scores above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores very highly. Conversely, **Accomodation** emerges as the weakest aspect, with a rating of just over 3.2. **Facilities** also fall on the lower end of the spectrum compared to other metrics. **Professors** are well-regarded, and **Value** is rated reasonably well.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.
Nearly all reviews are positive, highlighting knowledgeable and engaging professors, a wide course variety, and supportive university personnel. A strong interaction between instructors and students is frequently mentioned.
Most students praise rigorous, career-focused programs that prepare them for the job market and offer practical learning. Excellent faculty and industry connections are recurring themes, with ~0% negative feedback.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Most students praise the enriching teaching, supportive staff, and comprehensive programs. Positive experiences highlight helpful professors and professional development. A small fraction found the program to be entry-level and lacking organization.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.
Nothing to show
HEC Montréal's Supply Chain Logistics program is highly regarded for its excellent faculty, who bring a wealth of knowledge and professional experience to the classroom. The program is well-connected with industry leaders, offering students valuable networking opportunities. It emphasizes practical learning over theory, ensuring that students gain hands-on experience and real-world skills. Overall, it's a professional and comprehensive program that prepares students effectively for careers in supply chain management.
Nothing to show
I attended Greystone college in Vancouver and now I am searching for my coop work experience. The professors were knowledgeable and passionate about their subjects, and the classes were challenging but also engaging. One of the positive things is that in addition to learning updated topics, you also meet people from different parts of the world. Also there are plenty of extracurricular activities to get involved in as a volunteer, and they also hold job fairs for students to contact companies in the field. Finally, one of the things I would like them to improve is the the curriculum preparation workshops, where they should mention more the reality and difficulties of the market when looking for work. I would definitely recommend this college to anyone looking for a quality education in a supportive environment.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
