University of Sunderland vs McMaster University vs Sheridan College vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs Humber College

Side-by-side comparison from 310 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Le Cordon Bleu Paris (4.60)
University of Sunderland: wins 1/7 categories
McMaster University: wins 1/7 categories
Sheridan College: wins 0/7 categories
Le Cordon Bleu Paris: wins 3/7 categories
Humber College: wins 0/7 categories
ABC Business Academy: wins 0/7 categories
RUBIKA: wins 2/7 categories
Comparing
Sunderland, The United Kingdom
4.20
Read more reviews
63 reviews
×
Best programme: Business and Management
Hamilton, Canada
4.40
Read more reviews
85 reviews
×
Best programme: Life Science
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Film
4.60
Top
Read more reviews
8 reviews
×
Best programme: Culinary Arts
Toronto, Canada
4.20
Read more reviews
98 reviews
×
Best programme: Global Business and Management
Toronto, Canada
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Valenciennes, France
4.40
Read more reviews
14 reviews
×
Best programme: 2D Animation
Category ratings
Facilities
4.52
Win
4.22
4.30
4.50
4.14
Not rated
4.43
Location
4.15
4.13
4.33
4.75
Win
4.13
Not rated
3.14
Professors
4.44
4.22
4.29
4.63
Win
4.08
Not rated
4.29
Internationality
4.24
4.49
4.00
4.63
Win
4.17
Not rated
3.93
Student life
4.07
4.16
Win
3.98
3.88
3.87
Not rated
4.14
Value
4.16
4.38
4.19
4.13
4.04
Not rated
4.64
Win
Accommodation
3.75
4.10
3.85
3.00
3.66
Not rated
4.29
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical, UK-standard curriculum with critical thinking focus
  • +Supportive, knowledgeable, and accessible faculty
  • +Welcoming and supportive environment for international students
  • +Supportive and passionate professors
  • +Welcoming and diverse student community
  • +Engaging and versatile academic programs
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
  • +Practical, real-world focused programs
  • +Welcoming and helpful student services
  • +Exceptional chef instructors and curriculum quality.
  • +Strong emphasis on skill development and practical experience.
  • +Valuable international reputation and alumni network.
  • +Practical, real-world career preparation
  • +Supportive and industry-experienced faculty
  • +Excellent balance of hands-on and theoretical learning

Nothing to show

  • +Practical project-based learning for career readiness
  • +Supportive instructors from industry
  • +Positive school environment and student well-being focus
Cons
  • -Insufficient lecturers and inadequate course delivery
  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Unclear communication and lack of student involvement
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -The curriculum or teaching quality is frequently criticized.
  • -Poor administrative and customer service.
  • -Declining program quality and instructor expertise.
  • -Lack of employer recognition and career prospects.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment.
  • -Poor communication and administrative support.
  • -Lack of practical application and relevance in coursework.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication regarding important deadlines.
  • -Lack of support and understanding from professors and administration regarding student circumstances.
  • -Perceived disregard for student well-being and financial concerns.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring problem.
  • -Teaching quality and course content are often found to be lacking.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates considerable strengths in its **facilities**, scoring a high 4.52. **Professors** also receive positive recognition with a rating of 4.44. Areas that could benefit from further development include **accommodation**, which received the lowest rating at 3.75. Overall, the university presents a generally favorable image with solid scores in location, student life, internationality, and value.

This university receives its highest marks in **Internationality**, boasting a rating of 4.49. Close behind is **Value** at 4.38, followed by **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring 4.22. The **Location** also performs well with a 4.13 rating. The **weakest area** of the university, though still strong, is **Accomodation** at 4.10. Overall, the institution presents a very positive picture.

The university excels in its facilities, location, and professors, all receiving high marks. Student life and accommodation represent areas for potential improvement, showing the lowest scores among the surveyed categories. Internationality and value for money are also rated positively, indicating a solid overall offering.

Performance varies across key aspects of university life. Outstanding ratings were awarded for Location (4.75) and Professors (4.625), alongside strong marks for Internationality (4.625) and Facilities (4.5). Student Life (3.875) and Value (4.125) received good scores. Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.

Overall, this institution garners positive feedback across multiple aspects. Internationality stands out as its strongest area, achieving the highest rating. Conversely, accommodation received the lowest score, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other highly-rated categories include facilities, location, and professors, while student life and value also received favorable, though slightly lower, marks.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution excels in areas concerning financial benefit and campus resources. With an impressive **4.64**, "Value" stands out as the highest-rated aspect, closely followed by "Facilities" at **4.43**. Conversely, "Location" received the lowest score at **3.14**, indicating it's the weakest area. Other strong points include "Accomodation" and "Professors," both scoring **4.29**.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a ~84% positive sentiment, students highlight valuable experiences, practical skills, and supportive lecturers. A small fraction (~1.6%) of reviews noted insufficient lecturers or a course not meeting expectations.

Approximately 90% of university reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, knowledgeable and passionate professors, and a positive academic experience. No negative feedback was reported.

~93% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, practical courses, and supportive services. A small percentage (~7%) express dissatisfaction with service wait times and program quality.

All eight student reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.63/5. Students highly praise the knowledgeable instructors, quality curriculum, and enriching learning experience.

Approximately 74% of reviews highlight practical, real-world learning and supportive, industry-experienced professors. A small portion (~3.1%) express dissatisfaction with administrative communication and professor understanding.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~93% of feedback) with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students highlight excellent, industry-professional instructors, a focus on project-based learning, and supportive environments.

Rating distribution
5★
41%
53%
48%
63%
41%
0%
43%
4★
43%
36%
36%
38%
41%
0%
50%
3★
14%
11%
10%
0%
15%
0%
7%
2★
2%
0%
2%
0%
2%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
5%
0%
1%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Combined Honors in Economics and Mathematics

Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.

Environment

Its environment is excellent, but I need more than some strategies for grouping students. In some semesters, the professors ask the students to create their own groups for assignments. The students create their groups based on their geographical, linguistic, and religious categories, and the issue of diversity and inclusion is not considered. Sometimes, intelligent students form their own groups, and the issue of transparency in scoring becomes pale. I suggest the groups should be created by professors, because they know well and can balance their students in good and useful groups.

Student in 2013

I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.

Highly Educational!

Truly, Humber College will always be an educational institute that I will recommend to family and friends. The reason for this is because they put students first, and hire professors who are professionals in the field they are teaching. I graduated from the Child and Youth Care program in 2018, and really appreciated the fact that my professors were Youth Workers themselves. This allowed me to gain field knowledge, and experienced education. Furthermore, the campus is clean, safe and full of fun activities year round. All in all, Humber College was a great experience for me from 2015-2018.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close