McMaster University vs Wilfrid Laurier University vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris vs General Assembly vs Douglas College New Westminster
Side-by-side comparison from 179 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and passionate professors
- +Welcoming and diverse student community
- +Engaging and versatile academic programs
- +Welcoming and inclusive campus culture
- +Dedicated and approachable professors
- +Valuable practical experience and diverse programs
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Abundant study resources and learning activities
- +Networking opportunities
- +Practical, career-oriented programs with industry software
- +High-quality instructors and engaging, interactive learning environments
- +Abundant student resources for academic success
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
- -Facilities are often described as outdated and poorly maintained.
- -The curriculum or teaching quality is frequently criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequent frustrations.
- -Declining quality of faculty and department resources is a concern.
- -Outdated facilities and resources are a drawback.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and resources.
- -Poor communication and administrative issues.
- -Lack of practical application and relevant curriculum.
- -Students dislike the administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently mentioned.
- -The curriculum is often described as irrelevant or not engaging.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university receives its highest marks in **Internationality**, boasting a rating of 4.49. Close behind is **Value** at 4.38, followed by **Facilities** and **Professors**, both scoring 4.22. The **Location** also performs well with a 4.13 rating. The **weakest area** of the university, though still strong, is **Accomodation** at 4.10. Overall, the institution presents a very positive picture.
This institution receives its highest marks for Student Life, closely followed by its Value and Facilities. Conversely, Accommodations present the weakest area, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. Professors and Internationality also received solid, above-average ratings, while Location is rated slightly below the overall average.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
Overall, this institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in its facilities, location, student life, and accommodation, all receiving perfect scores. Professors and perceived value also score well, indicating solid academic and financial offerings. The weakest area identified is internationality, suggesting room for growth in attracting and supporting a global student body.
A consistently positive assessment emerges for this institution, with its **Professors** earning an exceptional 4.875. **Location** and **Internationality** also score highly, reflecting strengths in these aspects. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.125, indicating an area for potential improvement, while **Facilities** are rated moderately. Student life and value perceptions are solid.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
Approximately 90% of university reviews are positive, highlighting a supportive community, knowledgeable and passionate professors, and a positive academic experience. No negative feedback was reported.
With an average rating of 4.3/5, ~88% of reviews are highly positive, praising inclusive campus spirit, engaging programs, and approachable professors. A small amount of feedback (~3%) mentions academic advising issues and program specificity.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
With a single review, this university is rated a perfect 5/5. The student highlighted excellent professors and abundant study resources. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical, career-oriented programs and experienced, helpful instructors. No negative feedback was provided.
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Joining Mcmaster University is a wonderful experience. I personally have learned a lot. In addition, I really recommend and encourage students to join this school. University has a variety of courses.
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
