Waubonsee Community College vs University of Chicago Booth vs Illinois Institute of Technology vs DePaul University vs Loyola University Chicago

Side-by-side comparison from 33 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: University of Chicago Booth (4.50)
Waubonsee Community College: wins 0/6 categories
University of Chicago Booth: wins 0/6 categories
Illinois Institute of Technology: wins 2/6 categories
DePaul University: wins 0/6 categories
Loyola University Chicago: wins 0/6 categories
The University of Illinois at Chicago - UIC: wins 0/6 categories
Columbia College Chicago: wins 4/6 categories
Comparing
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.50
Top
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
13 reviews
×
Best programme: Design for TV and Film
Chicago, Illinois, United States
3.70
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.10
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Chicago, Illinois, United States
4.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Music Business and Entrepreneurship
Category ratings
Facilities
Not rated
4.00
4.67
4.08
4.67
3.91
5.00
Win
Location
Not rated
4.00
4.67
4.73
4.33
4.20
5.00
Win
Professors
Not rated
4.00
5.00
4.23
3.33
4.18
5.00
Internationality
Not rated
4.00
4.00
4.15
3.33
4.73
5.00
Win
Student life
Not rated
3.00
4.33
3.91
3.00
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
Not rated
4.00
4.33
Win
4.31
3.33
4.09
4.00
Accommodation
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Win
3.91
3.67
3.55
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros

Nothing to show

  • +Strong academics and challenging yet rewarding learning environment
  • +Supportive and highly educated professors
  • +University's ability to fulfill career aspirations
  • +Strong academic programs with practical application
  • +Supportive and knowledgeable faculty
  • +Collaborative and diverse learning environment
  • +Supportive environment with approachable, experienced professors
  • +Practical learning with real-world applications and career support
  • +Prime city location with easy campus navigation
  • +Accessible, knowledgeable professors
  • +Flexible scheduling for working adults
  • +Academically challenging curriculum
  • +Excellent academic programs and insightful professors.
  • +Diverse and inclusive environment with supportive student life.
  • +Prime urban location with convenient access to amenities.
  • +Creative environment and career preparation
  • +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
Cons

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are common complaints.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of support from faculty and staff are frequently mentioned.
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders academic progress.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are prevalent.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a significant problem.
  • -Administrative and management issues create frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is prevalent.
  • -Perceived ideological bias in teaching
  • -Disappointing experiences with the Honors College
  • -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment cause significant problems.
  • -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
Rating summary
What students say

Nothing to show

This institution garners strong marks in several key areas. Facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all received a solid 4 out of 5. Student life and accommodation are areas for potential improvement, both scoring a 3. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with particular strengths in academic and logistical aspects.

This institution garners strong commendations, particularly excelling in the **Professors** category with a perfect score. **Facilities** and **Location** also stand out with high marks. **Student Life** and **Value** are rated favorably, while **Accomodation** and **Internationality** show solid but less exceptional performance, representing the areas with the lowest scores.

Evaluations reveal a university that excels in location, achieving the highest rating. Professors and value for money also received strong scores. Areas needing improvement include student life and accommodation, which were rated lower than other categories. Facilities and internationality show solid, mid-range performance.

This institution receives its highest marks for its facilities, earning a commendable 4.67. Location is also a significant strength at 4.33. Conversely, student life received the lowest rating at 3.00. Other areas such as professors, internationality, and value hover around the mid-3 range, indicating room for improvement. Accommodations scored slightly better than the weakest categories but still fell below the overall average.

This institution receives particularly high marks for its **Internationality**, rated at 4.73. Location and Professor quality also stand out with scores above 4.2 and 4.18 respectively. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the lowest score at 3.55, indicating a potential area for improvement. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid middle range, generally exceeding 3.9.

This institution garners excellent feedback, with five-star ratings for its facilities, professors, location, student life, and internationality. However, accommodation presents a comparatively weaker area, receiving a three-star rating. The overall value is rated favorably at four stars, suggesting a generally positive student experience despite the accommodation limitations.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating, 100% of feedback is positive. Students are excited about attending, and find the academic rigor challenging and rewarding. Professors are described as highly educated and supportive.

All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students praise the rigorous curriculum, knowledgeable faculty, and research opportunities. A minor concern was the limited scholarship availability for international students and a lack of cultural diversity among Master's students.

Nearly all (92%) of the 13 reviews are positive, with students praising the supportive academic environment, approachable professors, and valuable Chicago networking opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

Two out of three reviews are positive (~67%), highlighting manageable workloads and knowledgeable, accessible professors. One positive review (~33%) also mentioned challenging academics. No negative reviews were recorded.

Most reviews praise UIC's diverse environment, strong academics, and supportive programs. While ~9% of feedback mentions issues like curriculum structure or perceived political leanings, the vast majority of students are satisfied.

With a 4/5 average rating from one review, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight the college as a great place for creatives, offering career-focused tools and opportunities. Success requires proactivity and effort.

Rating distribution
5★
0%
50%
33%
23%
0%
36%
0%
4★
0%
50%
67%
62%
67%
55%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
15%
33%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
9%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close