SKEMA Business School vs New York University - NYU vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs West Texas A&M University vs William Paterson University - WP
Side-by-side comparison from 278 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong academic programmes with practical application
- +Excellent opportunities for skill development and networking
- +Valuable international exposure and alumni support
- +Strong academic programs and accomplished faculty
- +Excellent career prospects and networking opportunities
- +Supportive and inclusive community environment
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +helpful and kind staff and advisors
- +strong dual degree programs
- +job opportunities
- +Modern resources & diverse environment
- +Strong academic staff & faculty
- +High graduation rate
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Administrative and management issues cause poor communication and disorganization.
- -Teaching faculty and their perceived focus on profit over education are criticized.
- -Guidance for career goals and clarity on doubts are lacking.
- -Lack of learning and value for money
- -Significant student debt
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustrations.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and lack of support are major concerns.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of support and unresponsive communication are common complaints.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university demonstrates particularly strong performance in its **Professors** (4.41), **Internationality** (4.36), and **Location** (4.25). **Facilities** (4.21) and **Student Life** (4.11) also receive favorable scores. However, **Accomodation** stands out as the weakest area, with a significantly lower rating of 3.58, while **Value** sits at 4.04.
This institution demonstrates a strong overall performance with particularly high marks for its professors. Facilities also received a very favorable rating. Conversely, student life and accommodation represent the areas with slightly lower, though still positive, scores. Internationality and value for money are also rated highly, indicating a well-rounded university experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
This institution garners solid ratings across most aspects. Professors stand out as the strongest area, achieving a near-perfect score. Location, at 3.5, is the comparatively weakest point among the evaluated metrics. Facilities, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value all received favorable marks of 4, indicating a generally positive experience for students in these domains.
Across all evaluated aspects, this institution garners perfect scores. Strengths are evident in every surveyed category, including facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. Conversely, no specific areas lag behind, as all ratings are consistently outstanding.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Over 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting student associations, international opportunities, and practical skills for careers. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions issues with management, communication, and course organization.
With an average rating of 4.29/5 from 123 reviews, nearly all feedback is positive (~99%). Students praise academic rigor, accessible faculty, and diverse community. One negative review expressed regret over student debt.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
With an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. Students praise incredibly helpful and kind staff across various departments, including Admissions and Financial Aid. The dual Finance and Economics program is highlighted as excellent, with good on-campus job opportunities.
With a 5/5 average rating, the university is highly praised. Students highlight excellent modern resources, faculty diversity, and strong academic staff, particularly in Arts. A high graduation rate is also a notable positive.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
