EADA Business School vs EU Business School vs IESE Business School vs ESADE Business School vs Universitat CEU Abat Oliba - CEU UAO
Side-by-side comparison from 799 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and relevant, up-to-date content.
- +Enriching international environment and diverse networking opportunities.
- +Balance of theoretical knowledge and practical, real-world business application.
- +Helpful professors and career support
- +Valuable practical and theoretical business knowledge
- +Enriching overall student experience
- +Inspiring cultural experiences and inclusive communities
- +Strong career advancement opportunities and alumni networks
- +High-quality academics and excellent faculty engagement
- +Collaborative environment and strong community
- +Practical learning with experienced faculty
- +Career development support and international opportunities
- +Practical, career-focused programmes with industry relevance
- +Strong professor-student relationships and support
- +Organized and clear academic experience
- +Expert professors and engaging, practical coursework
- +Strong emphasis on career preparation and networking
- +Vibrant, international campus and student life
- +Supportive and knowledgeable lecturers
- +Practical and well-structured courses
- +Welcoming and diverse international environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration and inflexibility.
- -Program delivery and content did not always meet advertised expectations.
- -Inconsistent quality of instruction or course focus was a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause disorganization and lack of support.
- -Outdated facilities and a focus on attendance over quality education are criticized.
- -The educational program is perceived as basic and unaccredited in some regions.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources negatively impact the learning experience.
- -Lack of communication and support from the institution is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major concern.
- -The curriculum lacks focus on critical thinking and intellectual development.
- -Facilities and IT infrastructure appear outdated and insufficient.
- -Administrative and management issues
- -Unqualified and unprofessional instructors
- -Outdated and low academic standards are prevalent.
- -Program management is ineffective and unhelpful.
- -The campus environment lacks traditional college experiences.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor internship support and disregard for student complaints.
- -Inconsistent staff helpfulness and attitude.
Considerable strengths emerge in the university's location, boasting an impressive 4.93 rating. Internationality also stands out at 4.79. While student life and professors received strong scores (4.58 and 4.49 respectively), accommodation represents the weakest area, scoring 3.73. Facilities and value also scored well, indicating a generally positive student experience.
This institution excels in several key areas, with Location and Internationality receiving the highest marks at 4.73. Student Life also scores well at 4.22. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.42, suggesting room for improvement. Facilities and Professors are rated consistently around 4.04, while Value sits at a respectable 3.87.
Overall, the university garners strong student satisfaction. Its most highly rated aspects include Internationality (4.74), Location (4.73), and Student Life (4.70). Professors (4.62) and Value (4.64) also receive excellent scores. The weakest area, though still positive, is Accomodation at 4.09, while Facilities are rated at 4.36.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its academic offerings, with Professors receiving a high rating. Internationality and Value are also positive aspects. Conversely, Accomodation appears to be an area for potential improvement, indicated by the lowest score among the surveyed categories. Facilities and Location also received mid-range ratings.
The university demonstrates strong performance in key areas, with accommodation receiving the highest score at approximately 4.27. Professors and location also score well, both around 4.25 and 4.17 respectively. While student life and value are rated at a solid 4, internationality presents the weakest area, scoring around 3.92. Facilities also reflect a strong average of 4.17.
Assessing the university's performance, its strengths lie notably in **Internationality** (4.78) and **Location** (4.52). Areas such as **Facilities** (4.34), **Professors** (4.34), and **Student Life** (4.37) also received positive marks. The **Value** (4.23) and **Accomodation** (3.79) categories represent the areas with the lowest scores in this evaluation.
Academic and international aspects of the university are highly regarded, with Professors receiving an exceptional score of 4.63 and Internationality a strong 4.56. Location and Value also perform well, both exceeding 4.3. Conversely, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring 3.69. Facilities and Student Life are rated moderately well, around 4.05 and 4.32 respectively.
With an average rating of 4.5/5 from 210 reviews, approximately 98% of students had a positive experience. They highlight enriching academic quality, expert professors, and an amazing multi-cultural environment. A small percentage of negative feedback mentioned administrative issues or unmet expectations.
Around 74% of reviews are positive, praising professors, career services, and valuable skills gained. The remaining ~7.6% of feedback expresses concerns about disorganization and the quality of education.
With a ~100% positive rating, reviews highlight exceptional experiences, transformative professional growth, and excellent faculty. Students praise the welcoming culture, global diversity, and strong career connections. No negative feedback was recorded.
Approximately 91% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong collaboration, practical learning, and career support. About 9% of reviews are negative, mentioning issues like finances and logistical challenges.
With a 4.31/5 average rating from 13 reviews, ~77% are positive, praising the practical approach, professor expertise, and close professor-student relationships. One negative review mentioned unprofessional leadership.
With a 4.35/5 average, ~97% of reviews are positive, highlighting engaging courses, knowledgeable professors, networking, and an international environment. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.
With an average rating of 4.58/5 from 43 reviews, ~93% are positive, highlighting supportive, knowledgeable lecturers, practical courses, and a welcoming, multicultural environment. A small ~4.7% of feedback expressed dissatisfaction with staff consistency and internship support.
In my experience, this business school is considerably more hyped than the actual value it delivers. While the marketing and reputation may create high expectations, the learning experience often falls short. One of the biggest concerns is the lack of placement support. Students are largely expected to manage their career opportunities on their own, which can be disappointing given the investment made in the program. Academically, many subjects are covered only at a surface level. The curriculum tends to focus on providing a broad overview rather than developing deep understanding or practical expertise. Most topics are wrapped up in just one or two classes, which is rarely enough to gain meaningful knowledge or build strong skills. As a result, students are often left to do significant self-learning if they want to truly understand the material. While the school introduces a wide range of business concepts, it doesn't always provide the depth, rigour, or hands-on learning that many students expect from a quality business education. Overall, I found the institution to be somewhat overrated, with the reputation and hype exceeding the actual learning outcomes and career support provided.
As far as universities go I think EU business school comes first in terms of student-staff relationship. Every member of the staff I have encountered has been more than helpful. What i think should improve as even tho its not connected to my previous point is I think the school should have more leniency towards tuition payment specially to international students because we are here despite the challenges of having to find willing banks to exchange local currencies to Euros.
Being at IESE was one of the best experiences of my life: 1- Professionally: this MBA is one of the best connected schools with top consultancy and banking sectors. for example, the 3 MBBs come to the school to train and interview candidates, ensuring a higher successful rate. It allowed me to jump from a civil engineering position to work for McKinsey. 2- Personal and cultural : amazing transformative 2 years, with people from all over the world (73 nationalities in my class) with great values. Totally worthy it.
Esade has been a great start for my career. You have the opportunity to learn a lot from classes, but also from the people (professors and other students). They really help you to do your first steps in the world, referrings to your career
Nothing to show
ie university is the best university in the world, they education system is the best and infrastructure. It's the best university to put your child to I'm very happy with it i dont wanna lie l. Please go for it
C3S is a very good Institution for International Students. The lecturers here are so enthusiastic and truly passionate about their subjects; their knowledge and encouragement make me feel ready for my future career. At C3S, I really felt like I belonged; the diversity is incredible, and everyone is genuinely kind. Plus, the support systems are really strong. The courses are top-notch, and the learning experience really sets you up for great career opportunities.
