SKEMA Business School vs Stetson University vs St. Mary's University, San Antonio vs Schiller International University vs Flatiron School
Side-by-side comparison from 164 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical, career-focused programs and skill development
- +Engaging student life and impactful associations
- +Strong academic faculty and international opportunities
- +Supportive and accessible faculty and staff
- +Inclusive and engaging campus community
- +Opportunities for holistic development and success
- +Extensive student support
- +Strong marketing and business programmes
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- +Supportive, knowledgeable staff and comprehensive curriculum
- +Strong job placement and career support
- +Strong marketing and business programs
- +Excellent career services and job placement
- +Engaging and supportive faculty
- +Experiential learning and entrepreneurship opportunities
- +Direct access to industry leaders (CXOs, CEOs)
- +Valuable networking and lifelong friendships
- -Poor administrative and management issues, including communication and exam organization.
- -Focus on profit over student well-being and discriminatory practices.
- -Unorganized program structure and overwhelming course load.
- -Excessive and confusing administrative processes
- -Insufficient and outdated facilities
- -Lack of support and engagement from faculty and staff
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
- -Administrative and management issues create significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
- -Communication is frequently unclear and inadequate.
- -Poor administrative and support services after enrollment.
- -Unresolved financial and logistical issues.
- -Lack of communication and assistance from staff.
- -Administrative and management issues are a major frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of essential resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of transparency from the institution are frequently mentioned.
This university receives high marks for its professors and internationality, with ratings of 4.42 and 4.35 respectively. Location and facilities are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. Student life and value are rated around 4.0, indicating solid performance. The weakest area is accommodation, which receives a score of 3.59.
Across surveyed categories, this institution demonstrates a strong showing in Internationality, achieving the highest score. Professors also received exceptionally high marks. Conversely, Value emerged as the lowest-rated aspect, indicating a potential area for improvement. Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Accommodation all fall within a solid mid-range, reflecting generally positive feedback across these essential university features.
This institution excels in several key areas, achieving perfect scores for Facilities, Professors, Student Life, and Accommodations. Value for money is also a significant strength, with a top rating. However, the university's weakest aspect is its Location, receiving a score of zero. Internationality is another area for improvement, scoring a moderate two.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
Overall, this institution garners consistently strong reviews across key aspects. Its strongest area is undoubtedly accommodation, receiving a perfect score, while facilities, professors, location, student life, internationality, and perceived value all achieve a solid 4 out of 5. This indicates a well-rounded university experience with a particular advantage in housing.
This institution excels in providing a strong international experience and boasts exceptional professors, earning a perfect score in both areas. However, it struggles significantly in several key aspects, receiving the lowest possible rating for its facilities, location, student life, accommodation, and overall value. These low scores suggest potential areas for considerable improvement.
Across a range of metrics, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths, particularly in its Professors, Student Life, Internationality, and overall Value, all receiving perfect scores. Location, Facilities, and Accommodations also stand out with high ratings. While no specific area received a low score, the consistency across the board suggests a well-rounded institution with particularly strong offerings in teaching quality and student experience.
Approximately 90% of reviews are positive, highlighting great teachers, valuable student associations, and international opportunities. A small fraction of negative feedback, around 3%, mentions concerns with management, communication, and organization.
With 100% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.44/5, students highlight a supportive and inclusive atmosphere. Recurring themes include helpful faculty, a close-knit community, and abundant academic and extracurricular engagement.
With one review received, the average rating is 5/5 stars. The feedback highlights strong student support. No negative reviews were submitted.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
With a 4/5 average rating from one review, the student experience is highly positive (~100%). The reviewer highlights knowledgeable and supportive staff, a well-structured curriculum, and strong job placement resources.
One review (100% negative) gave a 1/5 rating. The student described very poor post-enrollment service, citing unresponsiveness and unresolved financial issues.
All three reviews are highly positive, averaging 5/5 stars. Students highlight real-world business experience, including product development and profit generation, and valuable learning from industry leaders. They also praise opportunities for international collaboration and lifelong friendships.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I loved being at Schiller in Heidelberg. The setting and the city were very serene and the exposure to all those students and teachers from such different and diverse backgrounds was a great learning experience. Additionally, the ease of accessing the Schiller campuses in the other countries was a great additional bonus to studying at Schiller. I would most definitely recommend Schiller to other students who are looking for a very culturally fulfilling experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Being here has been such a wild ride. Moving to a new country every semester and learning local languages has been both fun and challenging, but it's kinda exhausting too. Still, that hustle gives me an adrenaline rush I low-key love! The best part has been seeing our business ideas come to life and when people genuinely appreciate and engage with something we’ve built, it makes all the hard work worth it.
