Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV vs National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF

Side-by-side comparison from 45 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA: wins 1/2 categories
Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI: wins 1/2 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 0/2 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/2 categories
Universidad de la Marina Mercante: wins 0/2 categories
Fundación H. A. Barceló: wins 0/2 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Audiovisual Communication
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Buenos Aires, Argentina
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Clinical Medicine and Community Health
Category ratings
Facilities
3.50
3.14
5.00
Win
4.00
4.00
Not rated
3.00
Location
5.00
4.07
5.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.50
4.63
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Internationality
4.00
4.00
5.00
5.00
3.00
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.00
4.11
Win
4.00
4.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.50
4.77
5.00
5.00
4.00
Not rated
5.00
Accommodation
1.00
2.97
5.00
5.00
2.00
Not rated
4.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent professors and well-equipped facilities
  • +Active, student-friendly campus environment
  • +Convenient location
  • +High academic standards and quality programs
  • +Passionate and caring professors
  • +Public and tuition-free access
  • +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
  • +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
  • +Wide range of specialization options
  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated professors and valuable learning experience
  • +Strong sense of professional identity and career preparation
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -The curriculum and teaching methods are often perceived as unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and lacks practical application.
Rating summary
What students say

The university excels in several key areas, boasting top scores for its location and strong marks for professors and value. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded. However, accommodation presents a significant weakness, receiving the lowest rating. Facilities are rated moderately.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners positive reviews, particularly excelling in **Professors** and **Value**, both receiving perfect scores. Areas of strength also include **Location**, **Student Life**, **Accomodation**, and **Internationality**, all rated highly at 4. In contrast, **Facilities** is the lowest-rated aspect, receiving a score of 3.

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 3 reviews are positive, contributing to a 4.67/5 average rating. Recurring themes include excellent professors and a well-equipped, student-friendly campus environment. Parking was a minor issue for one student.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Nothing to show

With one review and an average rating of 5/5, all feedback is positive. The reviewer highlighted excellent professors and respectable infrastructure, stating they owe their degree and profession to the university.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
33%
33%
100%
0%
0%
100%
4★
33%
56%
33%
0%
100%
0%
0%
3★
0%
11%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The Best and the Beast

One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close