Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Pontificia Universidad Católica Argentina - UCA vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Abierta Interamericana - UAI vs IES LV "Juan Ramón Fernández" - LV
Side-by-side comparison from 64 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
- +High-quality professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and career support
- +Practical, real-world application of learning
- +Supportive staff and comfortable facilities
- +High-quality education and valuable peer connections
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
- +Accessible and career-focused with internship/work opportunities
- +Supportive environment for academic and career guidance
- +Wide range of specialization options
Nothing to show
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of effective teaching and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a consistent problem.
- -Lack of effective communication and support is a recurring complaint.
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.
This institution demonstrates outstanding strengths in accommodation, receiving a high rating of 4.5, and particularly excels in value for money, scoring an impressive 4.625. Student life also garners exceptional feedback at 4.33. Conversely, the location presents the lowest-rated aspect, with a score of 3.67, indicating room for improvement in this area compared to its other well-regarded features.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
This institution garners excellent scores across most aspects. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. Student life is the sole area receiving a slightly lower, yet still strong, rating of 4.
Nothing to show
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
Nothing to show
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.
All 11 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.36/5. Students value the concrete teaching approach combining theory and practical application, excellent curricular level, and supportive staff and peers.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5, ~67% of reviews are positive, highlighting accessible career paths and helpful staff. The remaining ~33% of feedback is not negative.
Nothing to show
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
