Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV vs San Martin National University - UNSAM vs Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL

Side-by-side comparison from 48 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV (5.00)
Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM: wins 0/3 categories
Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA: wins 0/3 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 1/3 categories
San Martin National University - UNSAM: wins 2/3 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 0/3 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/3 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/3 categories
Comparing
Best programme: B.A. in Philosophy
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Government and International Relations
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Category ratings
Facilities
3.00
3.14
4.00
4.29
Win
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Location
5.00
4.07
5.00
4.43
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Professors
5.00
4.63
5.00
4.71
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
5.00
4.00
5.00
4.86
3.00
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
4.11
4.00
4.71
Win
Not rated
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.00
4.77
5.00
4.71
5.00
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
1.00
2.97
5.00
Win
3.14
Not rated
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Supportive and active campus environment
  • +High-quality faculty and resources
  • +Well-equipped facilities for learning
  • +High academic standards and quality programs
  • +Passionate and caring professors
  • +Public and tuition-free access
  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice
  • +Modern campus and well-equipped facilities
  • +High-quality, progressive academic programs and updated curriculum
  • +Supportive and professional faculty and staff
  • +Extensive virtual and campus network
  • +Pioneer in distance education

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.
  • -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and unresponsive administration create frustration.
  • -Lack of clear academic support and guidance leaves students feeling lost.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors, location, and internationality**, all scoring a perfect 5. Student life and value are also well-regarded with 4s. However, the university's **accommodation** is a significant weakness, rated only 1. Facilities are considered average at 3.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

An assessment of the university reveals a highly international environment, with a near-perfect score for Internationality. Professors, Student Life, and Value also received excellent ratings. However, Accomodation stands out as the weakest area, scoring significantly lower than other categories. Facilities are rated well, but not exceptionally.

Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers, equipped facilities, and a student-friendly campus environment. A minor parking inconvenience was noted.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

All 7 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.86/5. Students praise the modern campus, well-equipped facilities, updated curriculum, and professional faculty. They also highlight progressive programs, student well-being initiatives, and opportunities for career development.

With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
33%
100%
86%
0%
0%
0%
4★
50%
56%
0%
14%
100%
0%
100%
3★
0%
11%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

The Best and the Beast

One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close