Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs UCES vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV

Side-by-side comparison from 46 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV (5.00)
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/6 categories
UCES: wins 0/6 categories
Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA: wins 1/6 categories
Escuela Normal Superior en Lenguas Vivas "Sofía Spangenberg" - ENSLV: wins 5/6 categories
National University of San Antonio de Areco - UNSAdA: wins 0/6 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/6 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.30
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Advertising and Marketing
Best programme: Psychology
Best programme: Translation and Intercultural Communication
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Category ratings
Facilities
3.33
4.00
4.00
3.14
4.00
Not rated
2.00
Location
3.67
4.50
4.00
4.07
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Professors
4.00
4.00
4.00
4.63
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
3.33
3.00
3.50
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
Student life
4.00
3.00
3.50
4.11
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.67
3.50
4.00
4.77
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Accommodation
2.33
3.50
3.00
2.97
5.00
Win
Not rated
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +Flexibility in scheduling and venue choice
  • +Multiple campus locations
  • +High academic standards and quality programs
  • +Passionate and caring professors
  • +Public and tuition-free access
  • +Emphasis on teacher training and translation degrees
  • +Esteemed faculty and industry experts
  • +Comprehensive curriculum blending theory and practice

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
Cons
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Disorganized administration and unresponsive faculty create significant frustration.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities detract from the learning environment.
  • -Lack of career support and limited job opportunities cause student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a significant problem.
  • -Lack of practical experience and unclear course structure is disappointing.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

This institution garners a strong overall assessment, with its **Facilities, Professors, Location, and Value** all receiving excellent marks of 4 out of 5. Areas that present opportunities for improvement include **Accomodation**, rated at 3, while **Student Life** and **Internationality** are noted at a solid 3.5.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.

This university demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value. Facilities and student life also receive high marks, scoring a strong 4 out of 5. The only area not explicitly rated is its weakest, though the provided data indicates outstanding performance across all surveyed aspects.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

With 3 reviews, the average rating is 3.33/5. Approximately 33% of feedback is positive, praising the university's dynamism and flexibility in scheduling and venue options. No negative feedback was received.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

The single review for Ens en Lenguas Vivas Sofia E. Broquen de Spangenberg is highly positive, giving it a 5/5 rating. This 100% positive sentiment highlights the university's excellence in language education, particularly its teacher training and translation programs.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

Rating distribution
5★
67%
0%
0%
33%
100%
0%
0%
4★
33%
50%
33%
56%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
67%
11%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The Best and the Beast

One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close