Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad Nacional de la Matanza - UNLAM vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Favaloro
Side-by-side comparison from 55 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
- +Committed and experienced teaching staff
- +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
- +Supportive and active campus environment
- +High-quality faculty and resources
- +Well-equipped facilities for learning
- +Academic validity and expert tutors
- +Modern and accessible facilities
- +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
Nothing to show
- +Extensive virtual and campus network
- +Pioneer in distance education
- +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
- +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
- -Poor management and administrative support
- -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
- -Unattractive facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of support and engagement from instructors is a common complaint.
- -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and support from staff is a problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
- -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
- -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.
This institution receives excellent marks for its **professors, location, and internationality**, all scoring a perfect 5. Student life and value are also well-regarded with 4s. However, the university's **accommodation** is a significant weakness, rated only 1. Facilities are considered average at 3.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a clear dichotomy in its strengths and weaknesses. Professors are highly rated, earning a score of 4, indicating a strong academic core. Conversely, facilities, location, student life, and accommodation all received a score of 0, suggesting significant areas needing considerable improvement. The university shows moderate internationality (3) and excels in terms of value for money, with a perfect score of 5.
This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.
With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.
With a 4.5/5 average rating from two reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students highlight excellent teachers, equipped facilities, and a student-friendly campus environment. A minor parking inconvenience was noted.
Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4/5, feedback is overwhelmingly positive. Reviewers highlight the university's strong virtual learning environments and organized remote education system.
The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
