Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs National University of Mar del Plata vs Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT

Side-by-side comparison from 51 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: National University of Mar del Plata (4.70)
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 6/7 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA: wins 1/7 categories
National University of Mar del Plata: wins 0/7 categories
Torcuato Di Tella University - UTDT: wins 0/7 categories
Instituto Superior de Formación Docente N°41: wins 0/7 categories
National University Tres de Febrero - UNTREF: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Communication
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Psychology
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Accounting Technician
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Education Studies and English
Best programme: Arts and Sciences
Category ratings
Facilities
4.71
Win
4.00
3.22
4.00
Not rated
2.00
4.00
Location
4.86
Win
4.50
4.15
4.33
Not rated
4.00
3.00
Professors
4.43
4.00
4.68
Win
4.00
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
4.57
Win
3.00
4.00
3.67
Not rated
3.00
3.00
Student life
4.57
Win
3.00
4.12
4.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Value
4.86
Win
3.50
4.75
4.33
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.71
Win
3.50
3.04
4.33
Not rated
2.00
2.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Constant administrative support and efficient problem resolution
  • +Modern, comfortable, and well-organized campus facilities
  • +Valuable practical experience through industry connections and real-world projects
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +high academic standards and quality programs
  • +excellent professors who are passionate and caring
  • +public and tuition-free access to education
  • +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
  • +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
  • +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers

Nothing to show

  • +Dedicated and supportive teachers
  • +Balanced theory and practice in challenging classes
  • +Warm and respectful environment
  • +Specialized and innovative programs, especially in art, technology, health, and environment.
  • +Excellent infrastructure and highly qualified faculty.
Cons
  • -Lack of updated and functional facilities.
  • -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration and management.
  • -Inconsistent and unclear academic policies and support.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of personal attention.
  • -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
  • -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of clear communication and student support is a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant issue.
  • -Poor communication and administrative inefficiencies cause frustration.
  • -A perceived lack of support and engagement from instructors is common.
Rating summary
What students say

This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback from its students. Its strongest areas of performance are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are also highly rated, demonstrating excellent physical resources and living conditions. **Professors** represent the weakest area, though still scoring a commendable 4.43, indicating that while teaching quality is good, it's not as exceptional as other aspects. Student life and internationality are well-received, reflecting a vibrant and diverse campus experience.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

This university shows a remarkably strong showing in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving ratings well above four. **Student Life** and **Location** also score highly. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are the weaker aspects, with scores hovering around the three mark, indicating areas for potential improvement within the university's offerings.

This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.

Nothing to show

The university demonstrates notable strengths in its **professors**, **location**, and **student life**, all receiving a solid 4 out of 5. Conversely, the **facilities** and **accommodation** stand out as areas requiring significant improvement, both scoring a low 2. Internationality is moderately rated at 3, and the overall **value** is considered strong at 4.

This institution garners solid marks, particularly excelling in its **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Student Life**, all receiving a score of 4. The university also scores well in **Value**, mirroring these strengths. Its **Location** and **Internationality** are rated moderately at 3. The **Accomodation** stands out as a weaker area, receiving a score of 2, indicating potential room for improvement.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~74% of reviews praise consistent support, modern facilities, and valuable industry experience. No negative feedback was received.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 90% of reviews praising academic quality, professional professors, and student development. Some minor concerns exist regarding thesis process complexity.

All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.

Nothing to show

With a 4/5 average rating, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight well-prepared, dedicated teachers and a warm, respectful environment. Some mention the building needs improvement.

The university receives positive feedback (~100%) for its strong infrastructure, qualified faculty, and innovative, specialized programs. One review highlighted unique offerings in art, technology, health, and environmental studies.

Rating distribution
5★
40%
0%
35%
67%
0%
0%
0%
4★
30%
50%
53%
33%
0%
100%
100%
3★
30%
0%
12%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The Best and the Beast

One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close