Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad del Salvador - USAL vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA

Side-by-side comparison from 69 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Universidad del Salvador - USAL (4.70)
Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE: wins 2/7 categories
Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad del Salvador - USAL: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Belgrano - UB: wins 0/7 categories
Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA: wins 1/7 categories
Universidad Favaloro: wins 0/7 categories
Catholic University of Salta - UCASAL: wins 4/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: School of Business/Management
Best programme: School of Engineering/Technology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
4.70
Top
Read more reviews
3 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
3.00
Read more reviews
2 reviews
×
Best programme: Marketing and Communications
Best programme: Psychology
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Bachelor of International Studies
Category ratings
Facilities
4.75
3.33
3.33
4.00
3.14
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
4.75
4.08
3.67
4.50
4.07
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.50
3.92
4.00
4.00
4.63
Win
Not rated
4.00
Internationality
4.63
Win
2.92
3.33
3.00
4.00
Not rated
3.50
Student life
4.63
Win
3.60
4.00
3.00
4.11
Not rated
4.00
Value
4.75
3.85
4.67
3.50
4.77
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
4.75
3.27
2.33
3.50
2.97
Not rated
5.00
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Excellent support and resources
  • +Modern and well-equipped facilities
  • +Practical experience and industry connections
  • +Excellent professors with extensive experience and international perspective
  • +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects and practical application
  • +High-quality education and continuous improvements in facilities
  • +Highly qualified and supportive teachers
  • +Comprehensive and broad program curriculum
  • +Positive and well-structured learning environment
  • +Academic validity and expert tutors
  • +Modern and accessible facilities
  • +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
  • +High academic standards and quality programs
  • +Passionate and caring professors
  • +Public and tuition-free access

Nothing to show

  • +Updated and relevant program content
  • +Supportive and accessible faculty
  • +Well-resourced library and effective virtual learning environment
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause confusion and frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
  • -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world applications.
  • -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
  • -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program length.
  • -Unattractive and inconvenient building facilities.
  • -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities are a persistent problem.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management support creates significant frustration.
  • -Lack of clear communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
  • -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources are a common complaint.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency frustrates students.
Rating summary
What students say

Impressively high marks distinguish this university across most aspects of student experience. Facilities, location, accommodation, and value are particularly strong, all receiving a near-perfect 4.75. Student life and internationality are also well-regarded at 4.625. Professors are rated highly at 4.5, representing the most moderate score within this excellent overall assessment.

Academic aspects and campus positioning are clear strengths for this institution. Professors received a strong rating of 3.92, while location scored an impressive 4.08. Student life and value also demonstrated solid performance at 3.6 and 3.85 respectively. However, areas such as internationality (2.92) and facilities (3.33) are noted as comparatively weaker points, suggesting room for improvement.

This institution presents a well-rounded profile, excelling particularly in **Value**, which received the highest rating. **Professors** and **Student Life** also scored strongly, indicating positive experiences in these areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest rating, suggesting it may be an area for improvement. **Facilities** and **Internationality** fall in the mid-range, while **Location** is rated moderately well.

The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.

Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.

Nothing to show

This institution achieves excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, location, and accommodation all received perfect scores, indicating exceptional quality. Student life and professors are also highly rated. The weakest aspect appears to be internationality, with a score of 3.5. Overall, the university presents a strong offering, particularly in its physical resources and accessibility, with excellent perceived value.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.18/5, ~91% of reviews are positive. Students praise excellent education, supportive staff, modern campus facilities, and career opportunities. No negative feedback was received.

Most reviews (approximately 74%) praise the quality education, experienced professors, and good job prospects. A small portion (about 13%) mentions outdated curricula and management issues.

Students praise remarkable teachers, well-organized information, and a broad, holistic program. Positive feedback (~100%) highlights a supportive learning environment and a balanced approach, with minor drawbacks noted on course availability and virtual options.

Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.

Nothing to show

With a 4.5/5 average rating and 100% positive feedback, students highlight the updated program content focusing on new technologies and media. They praise excellent professor support and quick assignment feedback, alongside an extensive library.

Rating distribution
5★
45%
33%
67%
0%
33%
0%
50%
4★
27%
33%
33%
50%
56%
0%
50%
3★
27%
20%
0%
0%
11%
0%
0%
2★
0%
7%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
7%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

The Best and the Beast

One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close