Universidad de Palermo - UP vs Universidad Argentina de la Empresa - UADE vs Instituto Tecnológico de Buenos Aires - ITBA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB
Side-by-side comparison from 76 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Flexible study options and personalized learning paths
- +High-quality professors with real-world experience
- +Practical, project-based learning and career support
- +Constant administrative support and efficient problem resolution
- +Modern, comfortable, and well-organized campus facilities
- +Valuable practical experience through industry connections and real-world projects
- +Excellent and dedicated teachers preparing for real-world challenges
- +Supportive learning environment and community
- +Strong focus on technology and engineering
- +Strong engineering programs with good job prospects
- +Dedicated and experienced teaching staff
- +Flexible learning options and improving infrastructure
- +Academic validity and expert tutors
- +Modern and accessible facilities
- +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
- +high academic standards and quality programs
- +excellent professors who are passionate and caring
- +public and tuition-free access to education
- +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
- +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
- +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of engagement from instructors and insufficient course relevance are common complaints.
- -Lack of updated and functional facilities.
- -Poor communication and responsiveness from administration and management.
- -Inconsistent and unclear academic policies and support.
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent complaint.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are common grievances.
- -The curriculum and teaching quality are sometimes criticized.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and unhelpful staff.
- -Outdated curriculum and excessively long program duration.
- -Unattractive and uninviting building facilities.
- -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
- -Overcrowded classes and lack of personal attention.
- -Inefficient administrative and management processes.
- -Outdated facilities and inadequate resources.
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life, scoring a high 4.6, and facilities, rated at 4.4. Conversely, location, accommodation, internationality, and value all received a moderate 3.8, indicating areas for potential improvement. The academic side is well-regarded, with professors achieving a solid 4.2. Overall, the university offers a good experience, particularly in its campus resources and social environment.
This university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback from its students. Its strongest areas of performance are clearly **Location** and **Value**, both receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** and **Accommodation** are also highly rated, demonstrating excellent physical resources and living conditions. **Professors** represent the weakest area, though still scoring a commendable 4.43, indicating that while teaching quality is good, it's not as exceptional as other aspects. Student life and internationality are well-received, reflecting a vibrant and diverse campus experience.
Across all surveyed aspects, this institution garners perfect scores, indicating an outstanding educational experience. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated as excellent. There are no weak areas identified; the university demonstrates exceptional strength in every category evaluated.
This institution garners its highest marks for **Location** (4.2), a key strength. Professors are also well-regarded at 3.8. Conversely, **Internationality** received the lowest score (2.7), indicating an area for potential improvement. Other aspects like Facilities and Accomodation received moderate ratings, while Student Life and Value fall in the middle ground.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.
This university shows a remarkably strong showing in **Value** and **Professors**, both receiving ratings well above four. **Student Life** and **Location** also score highly. Conversely, **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are the weaker aspects, with scores hovering around the three mark, indicating areas for potential improvement within the university's offerings.
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.
University feedback is overwhelmingly positive, with ~77% of reviews rating it 4–5 stars and an average of 4.31/5. Students praise flexible study plans, project-based learning, and excellent professors. No negative feedback was reported.
~74% of reviews praise consistent support, modern facilities, and valuable industry experience. No negative feedback was received.
With an average rating of 4.5/5, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent teachers and strong preparation for the workforce. Facilities are acceptable and undergoing remodeling.
Reviews indicate positive experiences with education, job prospects, and teaching staff (~67% positive). Some negative feedback (~16.7%) mentions outdated curricula and program management issues. The average rating is 3.67/5.
Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.
The university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback, with approximately 90% of reviews praising academic quality, professional professors, and student development. Some minor concerns exist regarding thesis process complexity.
All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Undoubtedly Buenos Aires is a big city with many options in terms of higher education, but the Technological Institute is undoubtedly the best option (in my opinion) to study everything related to technology. I studied computer and data engineering, the experience was great. The teachers are qualified, the facilities are acceptable, and the classmates were very supportive.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
