London School of Economics and Political Science - LSE vs University of Aberdeen vs Robert Gordon University - RGU vs EM Normandie - EM Normandie vs London Academy of Trading - LAT
Side-by-side comparison from 427 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Knowledgeable and approachable faculty
- +High-quality academic programs and clear feedback
- +Excellent facilities and resources
- +Supportive community & accessible academic help
- +High-quality, engaging academic programs
- +Vibrant campus life & diverse opportunities
- +Practical, career-focused courses with engaging content.
- +Supportive environment, friendly staff, and good university community.
- +Modern campus, useful facilities, and helpful international services.
- +Practical, industry-relevant courses and inspiring professors
- +Rich international environment and diverse student body
- +Personal and professional development opportunities
Nothing to show
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
Nothing to show
- -Poor teaching quality and unstructured courses.
- -High fees combined with lack of support and career services.
- -Limited social life and judgmental environment.
- -Administrative and management issues frustrate students.
- -Outdated facilities and poor technology hinder learning.
- -Lack of accessible resources and support is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder learning experiences.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from staff is a recurring problem.
- -Financial concerns and perceived low educational value.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals a diverse set of scores. The strongest areas are **Internationality** and **Location**, both receiving very high marks. **Student Life** stands out as the weakest performing category. Other areas like **Professors**, **Accomodation**, and **Facilities** received solid, above-average ratings, with **Value** also scoring positively.
Performance metrics indicate a consistently strong showing for the institution. Outstanding marks were achieved in Internationality (4.7) and Professors (4.59), reflecting excellent global engagement and faculty quality. Location also received a high rating. The weakest area identified was Accomodation, scoring 4.19, though still generally positive. Overall, the university demonstrates a high level of satisfaction across various aspects.
This institution garners exceptional ratings, particularly in **Internationality** (4.55) and **Professors** (4.519). Its **Facilities** (4.508) and **Value** (4.43) also score very highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Accomodation**, which received the lowest score at 3.941. **Location** and **Student Life** are rated moderately well, both around 4.1.
This institution garners excellent marks in several key areas. Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value all received high scores of 4.125. Student Life and Accommodations are rated lower, at 3.625 and approximately 3.57 respectively, indicating these are areas with more room for improvement compared to its other strengths. The Location score sits at 3.75.
Nothing to show
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
Nothing to show
Approximately 96.6% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable professors, supportive learning environments, and strong academic reputations. A small percentage (around 3.4%) of negative feedback cites issues with lecturing, grading, and course structure.
With a 4.64 average rating from 44 reviews, ~95% of feedback is positive. Students praise the supportive environment, engaging courses, and helpful faculty. Some noted limited campus facilities during peak times.
With ~92% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.53/5, students praise the practical, career-focused courses, supportive environment, and engaging atmosphere. Excellent facilities, professional faculty, and helpful staff are recurring themes. No negative reviews were recorded.
Most reviews praise the inspiring professors, practical learning, and international environment, contributing to a ~74% positive sentiment. One review expressed dissatisfaction, calling it a money-making scheme with mediocre teaching.
Nothing to show
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
Nothing to show
LSE is a great place to create life-long connections and friends. There's a certain sense of community that is special to the university. The staff are hands-on and approachable. The facilities are modern and well-equipped.
The University of Aberdeen is a unique learning environment for students interested in want to deepen their knowledge. The lecturers in Aberdeen a really business-like. As a student who has been in the University since 2020, I can confirm that students get value for their tuition through the sacrifices of the lecturers and the academic environment.
My experience as Robert Gordon was quite stress free and insightful.I received lots of coaching and mentorship from Lecturers and senior colleagues ,all the materials I needed to make a headway were available to me ,my lecturers were very friendly and open to any form of guidance and academic assistance needed at any point in time.I am really grateful for my choice of school and all the support I received from Robert Gordon.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
