Universidad del Cema - UCEMA vs Universidad Tecnológica Nacional - UTN vs Universidad de Belgrano - UB vs Universidad de Buenos Aires - UBA vs Universidad Favaloro
Side-by-side comparison from 58 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class faculty with practical, real-world experience
- +High-quality education encouraging critical thinking and idea generation
- +Excellent value for money
- +Strong engineering programs and good job prospects
- +Committed and experienced teaching staff
- +High-quality education providing a solid foundation
- +Academic validity and expert tutors
- +Modern and accessible facilities
- +Efficient and time-optimizing programs
- +High academic standards and quality programs
- +Passionate and caring professors
- +Public and tuition-free access
Nothing to show
- +Comprehensive curriculum with strong theoretical and practical foundation
- +Supportive faculty and valuable real-world experience through practicums/assistantships
- +Dynamic and diverse learning environment with helpful, analytical teachers
- +Beautiful, well-maintained campus
- +Professional, dedicated teachers
- +Enriching, supportive learning environment
- -Administrative and management issues cause constant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations create confusion.
- -Poor management and administrative support
- -Outdated curriculum and excessive program length
- -Unattractive facilities
- -Limited student diversity and broader university experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of student support and engagement is a concern.
Nothing to show
- -Students dislike administrative and management issues.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a recurring problem.
- -Lack of clear communication and support frustrates students.
- -Administrative & management issues are frustrating.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a problem.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
With an outstanding perfect score in Internationality, this institution truly shines in its global engagement. High ratings also highlight its excellent Facilities, Location, Student Life, Accommodation, and Value, all scoring a strong 4.5. The only area receiving a slightly lower, though still positive, score is its Professors, at 4.
This institution performs exceptionally well in location, boasting a rating of 4.09. Professors are also highly regarded at 3.91, and value for money receives a solid 3.73. Student life and facilities are rated moderately. However, internationality stands out as the weakest area, with a rating of 2.82, followed closely by accommodation at 3.27.
The university demonstrates a solid overall performance, with **location** standing out as its strongest asset at 4.5. Facilities and professors also received favorable marks of 4. Conversely, student life and internationality are areas for potential improvement, both scoring 3. Accommodations and value for money are rated moderately at 3.5.
Overall, the university receives strong ratings in most surveyed categories. Professors and value are notably high, alongside excellent student life and internationality. The location is also well-regarded. However, facilities and accommodation received the lowest scores, indicating areas for potential improvement.
Nothing to show
This institution garners strong reviews, particularly excelling in student life, accommodation, location, and value, all receiving a high 4.33. Facilities and professors also score well with a solid 4. A notable area for improvement is internationality, which received the lowest rating of 3.67, suggesting a potential focus for development.
This institution garners outstanding marks across all assessed criteria. Its strengths are evident in consistently perfect scores for facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value. No specific weaknesses are identified within these ratings, indicating a uniformly excellent student experience.
All three reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight world-class faculty with practical experience, accessibility of virtual classes, and excellent value for money.
With an average rating of 3.69, ~62% of reviews are positive, praising good education and experienced professors. Around 15% are negative, citing outdated curricula and poor program management.
Reviews are split, with 1 positive and 1 negative comment. Positive feedback highlights academic quality, tutors, and efficiency. Negative comments mention a lack of diverse student interaction due to small class sizes.
With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 36 reviews, ~92% are positive. Students praise high academic standards, excellent professors, and quality programs that foster critical thinking. Minimal negative feedback was noted.
Nothing to show
All 3 reviews were positive, resulting in an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlighted comprehensive curriculum, supportive faculty, and valuable real-world experience, with only minor mentions of areas for practice improvement.
With a perfect 5/5 average rating, feedback is exclusively positive. Students highlight the beautiful campus and highly professional, dedicated teachers. Negative reviews are non-existent.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
One of the best spanish-speak university in the word. Prestigious and free. The lack of material resources encourages one to be proactive and gives you that “street wisdom” that more classy universities dont have.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
