University of New York in Prague - UNYP vs Charles University vs Czech Technical University in Prague - CVUT vs University of Finance and Administration - VSFS vs Rochester Institute of Technology - RIT
Side-by-side comparison from 174 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Personal, individual, and supportive student approach
- +Engaging, practical, and critical thinking-focused classes
- +Knowledgeable professors with real-world expertise
- +Passionate and expert professors
- +Numerous academic and extracurricular opportunities
- +Diverse and international environment
- +Expert faculty & modern, practical curriculum
- +Strong career support & global recognition
- +Well-regarded technical programs
- +Expert faculty with practical experience and supportive teaching
- +Tailored learning with individual approach and flexible course options
- +Modern campus environment and relevant, job-market-ready programs
- +Supportive faculty and engaging academic environment
- +Modern facilities and vibrant campus life
- +Welcoming atmosphere and diverse community
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and unresponsiveness from instructors are major concerns.
- -Poor student treatment and high failure rates.
- -Discriminatory practices towards international students.
- -Lack of fair assessment opportunities.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of effective communication and transparency is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are frequently cited.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are a common complaint.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a recurring problem.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment are a common complaint.
- -Lack of resources and support negatively impacts the learning experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution performs exceptionally well in **location**, boasting a near-perfect score. **Student life** and **internationality** also received very high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated category. Other areas like **facilities**, **professors**, and **value** received solid, positive scores, indicating a generally well-regarded university experience.
Overall, the university demonstrates robust performance in several key areas. Professors and location receive particularly high marks, alongside strong scores for student life and internationality. Value is also rated favorably. The weakest areas, though still respectable, are facilities and accommodation.
This institution garners high marks for its **Facilities**, scoring a notable 4.46. Professors, student life, and overall value are also well-regarded, all receiving a consistent 4.31. Internationality sits at a solid 4.0. The weakest area identified is **Accomodation**, which received a rating of 3.85, indicating room for improvement in this aspect.
This institution receives strong marks for its academic staff, with professors rated highly at 4.67. Facilities, student life, accommodation, and overall value are all well-regarded, scoring a solid 4. The university also benefits from a convenient location and good accommodation options, both receiving 4.5 stars. Its weakest area is internationality, which, at 3.67, is notably lower than other assessed aspects.
Across key metrics, this institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both receiving scores above 4.35. **Student Life** also garners excellent feedback, close behind. Conversely, the **Location** receives the lowest rating among the surveyed areas. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Accomodation**, and **Value** fall within a good, solid range, indicating a generally positive but varied student experience.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
All 46 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.65/5. Students praise the personal approach, engaging and practical classes, and supportive, knowledgeable professors.
Over 97% of reviews are positive, praising excellent professors and numerous academic/extracurricular opportunities. A small fraction of feedback (~3%) mentions poor student treatment and unfair academic progression.
With an average rating of 4.31/5 from 16 reviews, feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). Students praise good teachers, useful projects, and career help, noting high-quality, modern education and opportunities for internships and jobs.
All three reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.33/5. Students highlight excellent academics, supportive teachers, and a friendly environment, with one mentioning a personalized approach and innovative practices.
With an average rating of 4.18/5 from 39 reviews, approximately 93% of feedback is highly positive. Students frequently praise academic rigor, faculty support, modern facilities, and a vibrant campus life. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I really like UNYP because the teachers are so enthusiastic about the subjects they teach. Generally, most of the lessons were very interesting and engaging, and I truly enjoyed them. The teachers are experts in their respective fields, and it's always fun to talk to them about research and ideas. Additionally, I would really like to point out the opportunities, general contacts and experiences in psychology!
My name is Bashar Ali, I am a medicine student in the first year. Today I am going to share my experience in Charles university. As a new student I was confused at the beginning of the year but after not long time I got used to the university system and the university stuff was very helpful starting from professional and nice teachers and ending with office employees. For me the academic side was perfect and my experience was very good. The university provide us with valuable information and we can find a lot of different students from different parts of the world so we can meet people from different cultures. I lived in the dorms and for me it was good because it was safe, clean and cheap. Now I am very happy in my studies especially that the university degree is recognized all over the world in addition that it is one of the highest ranking in the world in conclusion, Charles University offers a world-class medical education that combines rigorous academics, exceptional clinical training, and abundant research opportunities
Firstly, I would like to mention that CVUT is one of the best unis in Czech Republic. After graduating it gives a plenty of opportunities to work since its certificate is recognised around the world in huge companies. It’s not a secret that not all of the students can work while studying, it’s quite difficult to study there but it worth it. Inside, every faculty’s building is modern. Especially FIT, where I am studying now looks great. Professors and tutors create opportunity to study, they can answer to all your questions if there are. Secondly, getting to the uni is not that difficult even if you live far from it. Transportation in public is so developed and trams can get you anywhere quickly. For instance, I am living in Prague 3 and uni is located in Prague 6, even though in map it the distance could be seen so far, by using tram I get to the uni in 20-30 minutes. To sum up, it can be difficult to study there and subject can be hard too but it worth it since after it creates you a huge opportunity to work in successful companies without any doubt.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
