University of Toronto - UofT vs Simon Fraser University vs University Canada West - UCW vs Thompson Rivers University - TRU vs Le Cordon Bleu Paris
Side-by-side comparison from 495 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +World-class professors and high academic standards
- +Networking opportunities and diverse programs/clubs
- +Welcoming environment and accessible campus amenities
- +High academic quality and challenging programs
- +Excellent co-op and international study opportunities
- +Access to great resources and expert faculty
- +Practical, job-market relevant programs with experienced faculty
- +Diverse environment fostering adaptability and confidence
- +Affordable tuition and flexible scheduling
- +Small class sizes and dedicated professors
- +Valuable, practical courses and personal growth opportunities
- +Supportive, inclusive, and beautiful campus environment
- +exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable, approachable instructors
- +strong emphasis on precision, quality, and professional skill development
- +welcoming environment and supportive alumni network
- +Practical, hands-on learning and real-world applications
- +Supportive and approachable instructors with clear explanations
- +Excellent facilities and opportunities for engagement
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -- Administrative and management issues, including understaffed services and long wait times.
- -- Subpar teaching quality and a focus on memorization over genuine learning, with overworked students and TAs.
- -- Lack of career support, insufficient resources, and a highly competitive, often isolating, academic environment.
- -Poor course organization and ineffective teaching methods.
- -Negative atmosphere and unprofessional conduct.
- -Ideological bias in non-science courses.
- -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of essential resources are frequently mentioned.
- -Students express dissatisfaction with the quality of teaching and curriculum.
- -Outdated facilities and poor parking.
- -Inconsistent professor quality and basic course content for advanced studies.
- -Overpriced housing in the surrounding area.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of career support and industry relevance leads to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and equipment hinder learning.
- -Lack of resources and support are common complaints.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This institution demonstrates considerable strengths in several key areas. It excels in **Internationality** (4.42), **Location** (4.38), and **Value** (4.24). Performance in **Facilities** (4.20) and **Professors** (4.15) is also robust. The areas with the lowest scores are **Student Life** (3.80) and **Accomodation** (3.85).
This institution receives high marks, particularly for its internationality (4.20) and professors (4.12). Value for money is also a strong point (4.06). The weakest area identified is student life, with a rating of 3.52, though facilities (3.88), location (3.76), and accommodation (3.67) are still considered respectable.
This university presents a generally positive profile, with its **location** standing out as the strongest area, achieving a perfect 4.5. **Internationality** and **facilities** also received high marks. Conversely, **accommodation** represents the weakest aspect, with a significantly lower rating. Other categories like professors, student life, and value fall within a respectable range, indicating a well-rounded but not perfect student experience.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several areas, with Professors, Location, and Value all receiving very high marks. Student Life and Internationality are also rated positively. However, the university's Facilities and Accommodations are its weakest points, showing significantly lower scores compared to other evaluated aspects.
This institution receives high marks for its Location, scoring 4.78, and for its Professors and Internationality, both at 4.67. Facilities also rate well at 4.56. Student Life and Value are both solid at 4.00. The weakest area is Accomodation, which received a rating of 3.22.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in academic areas, with Professors receiving a high rating of 4.42 and Internationality also scoring well at 4.32. Facilities and Location are similarly well-regarded. Student Life and Accommodations, however, present areas for potential improvement, with ratings of 3.94 and 3.44 respectively. Overall value is rated at a solid 4.0.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
~84% of reviews are positive, highlighting strong academics, helpful faculty, and networking. A small ~2% of feedback notes concerns about student services, teaching quality, and workload.
With a high average rating of 4.06/5 from 69 reviews, ~82% of students express satisfaction. Positive feedback highlights strong academic programs, excellent co-op and exchange opportunities, and access to great resources. A small ~1.5% of reviews mention negative atmosphere and poor course organization.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback (~100% of reviews) highlights practical, fast-paced programs and experienced professors. Students value academic and professional growth, strong analytical skills, and a diverse environment. No negative reviews were provided.
With an average rating of 4.1/5 from 29 reviews, ~93% of feedback is positive, highlighting valuable courses, small class sizes, supportive professors, and personal growth opportunities. A small fraction (~7%) of negative comments cite issues with some basic courses and registration processes.
All 9 reviews are positive, with an average rating of 4.67/5. Students highlight exceptional teaching quality and knowledgeable instructors, along with impeccable facilities. The curriculum and emphasis on precision are frequently praised.
Most students find the university's practical, hands-on learning and supportive professors highly beneficial. Excellent facilities and career-focused courses are frequently praised. There is no reported negative feedback.
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
The program itself is great and really prepares you for an academic career, but the quality of the supervisors varies a lot. Some people in the department are excellent and enjoy empowering their students, but the majority of profs make you feel like they're doing you a favour by giving you their time of day/guidance. Might be an issue exclusively with this department, but still. And the campus is cool! Great cheap eats around. Shout out to El Rey for when you want to splurge a bit and get some awesome tacos!
Nothing to show
You can study and get a degree here, but the university in itself cares little about students and does very little to help when needed. Guidelines are very vague and facilities are not built for as many students as are accepted.
Each professor that I have had so far was extremely encouraging and was often willing to go the extra step to make sure I understood the course content. The professors I could tell were very tenured and loved their roles. This helped me to foster even more of a passion for sociology, and I would highly recommend students take at least one course because the experience is quite interesting.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
