University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC vs Petre Andrei University of Iași vs Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty vs Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi

Side-by-side comparison from 92 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty (5.00)
University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB: wins 0/5 categories
Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi - UAIC: wins 0/5 categories
Petre Andrei University of Iași: wins 0/5 categories
Electrical Engineering, Energetics and Applied Informatics Faculty: wins 4/5 categories
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering - The Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iasi: wins 0/5 categories
Faculty of Computer Science - Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iasi: wins 0/5 categories
Gheorghe Asachi Technical University of Iaşi - TUIASI: wins 1/5 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Maths
Best programme: Advertising and Communication
Best programme: Commerce
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Economics and Management
Category ratings
Facilities
3.34
3.88
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
3.00
4.00
Location
4.20
4.21
5.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Professors
3.59
3.99
4.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
4.00
Internationality
3.51
3.58
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Student life
3.94
4.27
3.00
4.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Win
Value
3.72
4.09
3.00
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.50
4.50
Accommodation
3.15
3.97
3.00
5.00
Not rated
4.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
  • +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
  • +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
  • +Engaging and supportive faculty
  • +Valuable practical experiences and learning opportunities
  • +Affordable living costs and good facilities
  • +Convenient location and accessible teachers
  • +Support for balancing studies with work and other activities
  • +Strong technical training and faculty advantages

Nothing to show

  • +Supportive professors and faculty
  • +Positive learning environment
  • +Strong technical foundation and practical skills development
  • +Knowledgeable and supportive professors
  • +Interactive and interesting courses
Cons
  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
  • -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
  • -Outdated teaching methods and poor future preparation.
  • -Arrogant academic staff and poor student treatment.
  • -Inconsistent or poor communication from faculty and administration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources that hinder learning.
  • -Lack of engaging and effective teaching methods.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are major concerns.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support hinders academic success.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources are a problem.
  • -Disorganized curriculum and teaching quality are criticized.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a persistent problem.
  • -Lack of communication and transparency from the institution is a major concern.
Rating summary
What students say

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.

This university garners particularly strong ratings in **Student Life** and **Location**, both exceeding 4.2. **Value** and **Accomodation** also score highly, around 4.0. In contrast, **Internationality** presents the weakest area with a rating of 3.58, while **Facilities** also falls slightly below other metrics at 3.88. Professors are generally well-regarded, nearing a 4.0 average.

This institution achieves a perfect score for its **location**, making it a significant draw. However, its **facilities**, **student life**, **accommodation**, **internationality**, and **value** all receive moderate ratings of 3, indicating areas for potential improvement. The **professors** are a stronger point, earning a solid 4.

This institution achieves near-perfect scores in several key areas. Its facilities, professors, location, accommodation, internationality, and value are all rated a perfect 5 out of 5. The only slight deviation is in student life, which receives a very good score of 4. Overall, the university demonstrates exceptional strengths in its core offerings and environment, with student life being its most comparatively lower, yet still positive, aspect.

Nothing to show

Overall, this institution garners strong ratings, particularly excelling in **internationality** and **value**, both scoring an impressive 4.5. Students also seem satisfied with **professors**, **location**, **student life**, and **accommodation**, each receiving a solid 4. The weakest area, though still respectable, is **facilities**, which are rated at 3.

This institution achieves excellent scores across most aspects. Its strongest areas are Location, Student Life, and Accomodation, all earning a perfect 5. Internationality and Value also stand out with impressive 4.5 ratings. Facilities and Professors are rated a solid 4, representing the slightly less outstanding, though still positive, performance areas within this comprehensive evaluation.

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.

With an average rating of 4.05/5 from 19 reviews, approximately 74% are positive, highlighting good facilities and involved teachers. A small portion (~5.3%) experienced disappointment with teaching methods and arrogant staff.

With a 4/5 average rating, the single review is overwhelmingly positive. Students are delighted by accessible courses and approachable teachers, recommending the university for flexible learning. No negative feedback was received.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating, this university garners overwhelmingly positive feedback. One review highlights the electrical engineering faculty's strong professional and educational advantages, particularly in energy field technical training.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is overwhelmingly positive (~100%). One reviewer highlighted great professors and a pleasant study experience, particularly in the Faculty of Computer Science. No negative feedback was recorded.

Based on two reviews, the university has a 100% positive sentiment. Students highlight a strong technical foundation, practical skills development, and passionate, knowledgeable professors. Courses are described as interactive and interesting.

Rating distribution
5★
24%
37%
0%
100%
0%
50%
50%
4★
40%
37%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
3★
30%
21%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
2★
6%
5%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
My professors

My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close