Université de Toulouse vs EPITECH - EPITECH vs IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale vs INSA Toulouse – Institut National des Sciences Appliquées vs CESI

Side-by-side comparison from 18 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Université de Toulouse: wins 0/4 categories
EPITECH - EPITECH: wins 2/4 categories
IGS – RH Institut de Gestion Sociale: wins 0/4 categories
INSA Toulouse – Institut National des Sciences Appliquées: wins 2/4 categories
CESI: wins 0/4 categories
AMOS Sport Business School: wins 0/4 categories
EPSI l’école de l’ingénierie informatique: wins 0/4 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Biology
Best programme: ACS - Applied Computer Science
Best programme: Chemical and Process Engineering
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Aix en Provence, France
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Category ratings
Facilities
4.00
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Location
4.27
4.50
Not rated
4.50
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Professors
4.27
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Internationality
4.09
5.00
Win
Not rated
4.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Student life
4.00
5.00
Not rated
5.00
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Value
4.18
4.50
Not rated
5.00
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Accommodation
4.18
3.50
Not rated
4.50
Win
Not rated
Not rated
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Dedicated, accomplished faculty and rigorous academic programs
  • +Modern facilities and a vibrant, inclusive campus life
  • +Holistic, forward-thinking educational experience
  • +High-quality, balanced training with relevant topics.
  • +Strong company network for work-study and employment.

Nothing to show

  • +Multidisciplinary, practical, and industry-relevant curriculum
  • +Strong preparation for the professional world and career readiness
  • +International focus and development of teamwork skills

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues, with a focus on profit over student well-being and quality of education.
  • -Lack of soft skills oriented learning, despite a strong technical environment.
  • -High cost of education.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment
  • -Lack of adequate resources and support

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Overall, this institution garners strong ratings across multiple facets. It particularly excels in **Professors** and **Location**, both receiving a score of approximately 4.27. **Accomodation** and **Value** also perform well, averaging around 4.18. **Facilities** and **Student Life** are rated at a solid 4, indicating good, though not exceptional, performance in these areas.

This institution garners excellent scores, particularly in its student life and internationality, both receiving perfect marks. Professors are also highly regarded with a top rating. Facilities and location are strong points, both at 4.5. Value for money is rated well at 4.5. The weakest area identified is accommodation, with a rating of 3.5.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in student life, receiving a perfect score. High marks are also awarded to its facilities, location, and accommodation, all at 4.5. Internationality and professors are solid at 4. The university also achieves a perfect score for value, indicating a strong overall offering.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

All 11 reviews are positive, averaging 4/5 stars. Students praise exceptional faculty, comprehensive programs, modern facilities, and vibrant campus life, contributing to a holistic and supportive educational experience.

Reviews are mixed, with a 3/5 average. ~40% of feedback is negative, citing high cost and lack of student well-being support. Positive feedback highlights excellent training and good employment networks.

Nothing to show

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~100% recommending the university for its multidisciplinary education, professional preparation through practical experience, and international focus. Topics covered are topical and relevant to the modern world.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
4★
100%
20%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
3★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close