University Politehnica of Bucharest - UPB vs Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs 'Dunarea de Jos' University of Galati - DJUG vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 188 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Abundant opportunities for professional and personal development.
- +Supportive and approachable professors who facilitate learning.
- +Strong engineering programs with industry interest.
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Diverse faculty options and dedicated teaching staff.
- +Practical learning, job prospects, and useful skill development.
- +Relaxed atmosphere and helpful instructors.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues cause frustration.
- -Poor teaching quality and lack of student care are prevalent.
- -Outdated facilities and infrastructure are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from administration.
- -Inadequate and outdated facilities.
- -Limited career services and internship opportunities.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, scoring a high 4.2, and in **Student Life**, with a rating of 3.94. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area, receiving a score of 3.15. Other aspects like Professors, Internationality, and Value fall within a solid mid-range, indicating a generally positive but not exceptional performance in these categories.
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
The university receives strong ratings across most surveyed areas. Location stands out as its strongest point, followed closely by professors and value. Student life and accommodation are also rated highly. Internationality and facilities are areas where improvements could be considered, as they received the lowest scores. Overall, the institution presents a positive picture with notable strengths in key aspects of the student experience.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting ample opportunities and supportive professors. A small fraction of negative feedback (~6%) points to system issues and inconsistent educational standards.
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
Most reviews are positive (~95%), highlighting dedicated teaching staff, diverse faculties, and good career prospects. There are no negative reviews in the provided data.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
My first year was excellent there, there are a lot of friends you can make and the professors really do help us. I remember going to class and joking about random things with them. The exams are pretty simple because you learn from the class, you don't need pretty much anything when you have people like these around you.
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
