Central European University - CEU vs Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE vs University of Debrecen vs ESSCA School of Management vs Corvinus Business School

Side-by-side comparison from 187 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Central European University - CEU: wins 0/7 categories
Corvinus University of Budapest - BCE: wins 0/7 categories
University of Debrecen: wins 1/7 categories
ESSCA School of Management: wins 1/7 categories
Corvinus Business School: wins 4/7 categories
University of Pécs: wins 0/7 categories
University of Miskolc: wins 1/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Philosophy
Best programme: Communication Studies
Debrecen, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
84 reviews
×
Best programme: Chemistry
Best programme: International Business
Best programme: Business Management
Best programme: Psychology
Miskolc, Hungary
4.50
Read more reviews
11 reviews
×
Best programme: Environmental Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
3.56
4.50
4.68
Win
3.50
3.00
4.18
4.18
Location
3.44
4.67
4.33
3.67
5.00
Win
4.44
4.45
Professors
4.22
4.25
4.48
4.50
Win
4.00
4.14
4.27
Internationality
4.78
4.56
4.83
4.50
5.00
Win
4.53
4.27
Student life
4.00
4.50
4.50
4.33
5.00
Win
4.44
4.27
Value
3.78
4.38
4.43
4.33
5.00
Win
4.26
4.09
Accommodation
3.75
4.06
4.25
2.83
3.00
4.19
4.36
Win
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Diverse student body and international perspective
  • +High academic rigor and intellectual stimulation
  • +Expert faculty and dedicated mentorship
  • +Strong economics and business programs
  • +Supportive and expert faculty and staff
  • +International atmosphere and location
  • +Approachable and invested lecturers
  • +Internationally diverse and friendly student community
  • +Strong, well-structured programs with practical application
  • +International focus and diverse programs
  • +Experiential learning and networking opportunities
  • +Supportive professors and student community
  • +Challenging and skill-enriching academic environment
  • +Positive overall experience despite external factors
  • +Supportive scholarship opportunities
  • +Practical and theoretical course balance
  • +Approachable, experienced faculty
  • +Supportive, multicultural community
  • +Innovative learning environment and supportive community
  • +Internationalization and cultural diversity
  • +Accomplished faculty and top-notch facilities
Cons
  • -Rigid academic structure and lack of intellectual engagement.
  • -Insufficient financial aid and rising tuition fees.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently cited.
  • -There is a general dissatisfaction with the curriculum and teaching quality.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant stress.
  • -Lack of teacher support and career/job assistance is a major problem.
  • -The quality of studies is perceived as poor in many programs.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are frequently criticized.
  • -Lack of engaging teaching and curriculum concerns are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a constant source of frustration.
  • -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
  • -Course content and teaching methods are frequently seen as unengaging and irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment create a poor learning environment.
  • -Excessive administrative burdens and inefficient management cause frustration.
  • -Lack of accessible and timely support exacerbates student difficulties.
  • -Administrative and management issues create significant problems.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of adequate support and communication leaves students feeling unsupported.
Rating summary
What students say

Internationality stands out as the strongest area, achieving an impressive rating. Conversely, facilities present the weakest aspect, with a score of 3.56. Other areas like professors and student life received strong marks, while location, accommodation, and value also scored positively, indicating a generally well-regarded institution with distinct strengths and some room for improvement in its physical infrastructure.

The university demonstrates excellent performance in several key areas, with location receiving the highest marks. Facilities and student life are also rated highly. While accommodations are generally positive, they represent the lowest-rated aspect of the university experience. Overall, the institution presents a strong offering with particularly notable strengths in its physical environment and student engagement.

This institution garners exceptional praise for its **Internationality**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** also stand out with a high rating. Conversely, **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the surveyed aspects. The university demonstrates solid performance in **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value**, with **Location** also being well-regarded.

The university demonstrates considerable strengths, notably in its **Professors** and **Internationality**, both earning a high rating of 4.5. **Student Life** and **Value** also score very well at 4.33. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents the weakest area with a rating of 2.83. **Facilities** are rated at 3.5, and **Location** at 3.67, indicating room for improvement in these aspects.

This institution garners exceptional marks for its **location, student life, internationality, and overall value**, all receiving perfect scores. The quality of its **professors** is also highly praised. However, areas for improvement are evident in **facilities and accommodation**, which received lower, albeit still adequate, ratings.

This institution garners excellent marks in key areas, with Internationality standing out at 4.53, closely followed by Location (4.44) and Student Life (4.44). Value for money is also highly rated at 4.26. While Facilities and Accommodations also score well (around 4.18), Professors received slightly lower, though still strong, feedback at 4.14.

This institution garners strong marks across several aspects. Location stands out as the highest-rated area, followed closely by accommodation. Professors and student life also received commendable scores. While facilities and internationality performed well, the value proposition emerged as the lowest-rated category. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded profile with a particular strength in its physical setting and living arrangements.

Reviews summary
Highlights

~70% of reviews are positive, highlighting diversity, teaching methods, and faculty expertise. ~20% of feedback is negative, citing rigid academic structure and a lack of critical engagement.

With an average rating of 4.28/5 from 18 reviews, approximately 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight strong Economics and Business programs, international atmosphere, and a strategic campus location. No negative reviews were recorded.

Approximately 74% of reviews are positive, highlighting approachable lecturers and a beautiful campus. Negative feedback, about 4.3%, points to a lack of structured support and occasional issues with specific departments or programs.

With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 6 reviews, ~83% are positive, highlighting international focus, experiential learning, and networking. Some note demanding workloads.

This university receives very positive feedback, with ~100% of reviews being 4-5 stars. Students highlight the nourishing of skills and a competitive yet positive environment. Accommodation costs are noted as high.

University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~91%), highlighting a strong academic foundation with a practical and theoretical balance. Professors are praised for fairness, real-world experience, and approachability, creating a dynamic learning environment. Limited on-campus job opportunities were a minor concern.

The University of Miskolc receives overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being highly favorable. Students praise cutting-edge labs, approachable professors, a supportive community, and internationalization. No negative feedback was noted.

Rating distribution
5★
30%
39%
38%
33%
0%
44%
55%
4★
40%
50%
49%
50%
100%
47%
36%
3★
10%
11%
20%
17%
0%
9%
9%
2★
10%
0%
1%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
10%
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Excellent International Opportunity

Previously studying in the USA, moving to Budapest was a complete culture shock. However, this university offers a vigorous program with ample opportunities for students who want a career in diplomacy and foreign affairs. I feel constantly challenged and surrounded by bright-minded thinkers. Throwing myself into a new country, new culture, and new language has allowed me to truly be immersed in this field of study. While the program is in English, there are ample opportunities for additional foreign language classes. The fact that this university offers scholarships and the base price of tuition is already so low, is an added bonus.

A well-rounded programme

The university offers a strong academic foundation with well-structured courses and a wide range of modules to choose from. I appreciated the flexibility of the programme, which allowed me to explore my interests while still gaining core knowledge in my field. Lecturers were approachable and genuinely invested in students’ growth, and the academic support available was excellent. However, I found that some courses were a bit too theoretical and would have benefited from more hands-on or industry-relevant components. Despite that, the overall environment encouraged self-discipline, curiosity, and collaboration. I would recommend this university to students who are self-motivated and eager to take ownership of their learning journey.

Engaging

ESSCA School of Management is known for its international approach and diverse programs. In my opinion, many students appreciate its emphasis on experiential learning and the opportunities for international exposure through exchange programs and internships. However, some may find the workload demanding and challenging but that's the way it operates. Whether I recommend it would depend on your specific academic and career goals, as well as your preferences for learning style and environment. Likes/ Dislikes: *Essca provides enormous opportunities to improve and enhance your skill. *Diversified culture *Provides webinars and seminars across all the campuses. *Workload Management could be seen as an disadvantage. As sometimes, you may find it very challenging.

Nothing to show

Practical Hours/ Language Barrier

My honest opinion of PECS University has evolved significantly over the years. When I first started, I faced numerous challenges, including language barriers, a lack of lecturers who spoke English, and insufficient support for learning Hungarian, especially in my department. However, Pécs listened to our complaints and made strides to improve the situation. If someone had asked me whether I would recommend Pécs while I was still there, I would have said no. However, based on what I see now, I truly believe the improvements are worth giving it a chance. The university has enhanced its resources, offered more diverse course options, and fostered a more inclusive environment. It's also important to mention that Pécs is such a peaceful and serene city, which adds to the overall experience of studying there. If the opportunity arises for me to return for a master's degree, I would certainly consider it, as I believe the university is now better equipped to support its students' success. Overall, I appreciate PECS University's progress and look forward to seeing it grow.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close