ESCP Business School vs Warsaw University of Technology vs SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities vs Vistula University vs Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University

Side-by-side comparison from 273 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University (5.00)
ESCP Business School: wins 1/7 categories
Warsaw University of Technology: wins 0/7 categories
SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities: wins 0/7 categories
Vistula University: wins 0/7 categories
Collegium Humanum Warsaw Management University: wins 6/7 categories
VIZJA University: wins 0/7 categories
Warsaw School Of Computer Science - WSCS: wins 0/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Bachelor in Management
Best programme: Electrical Engineering
Best programme: Applied Psychology
Warsaw, Poland
4.00
Read more reviews
125 reviews
×
Best programme: Business Administration in Management
Best programme: Law
Warsaw, Poland
4.20
Read more reviews
42 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology
Category ratings
Facilities
4.09
4.33
4.25
3.87
5.00
Win
4.17
Not rated
Location
4.33
4.73
4.04
4.33
5.00
Win
4.37
Not rated
Professors
4.11
4.36
4.32
4.02
5.00
Win
4.17
Not rated
Internationality
4.80
Win
3.77
4.18
4.60
4.50
4.24
Not rated
Student life
4.17
4.18
3.59
3.89
4.50
Win
3.92
Not rated
Value
4.39
4.36
4.04
3.86
4.50
Win
3.93
Not rated
Accommodation
3.27
3.82
3.44
3.14
4.50
Win
3.59
Not rated
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +European campuses and multicultural environment
  • +Strong career preparation and top company recruitment
  • +Development of interpersonal and managerial skills
  • +Excellent faculty and professors
  • +Recognized and high-quality programs
  • +Engaging and practical learning experience
  • +Passionate and knowledgeable lecturers
  • +Well-organized and relevant programs
  • +Positive learning environment and resources
  • +Diverse and inclusive international environment
  • +Supportive and practical learning experience
  • +Welcoming atmosphere and good facilities
  • +High education level and experienced professors
  • +Valuable new skills acquisition
  • +Worthwhile academic decision
  • +Strong academic programs and accreditations
  • +Commitment to student development and success
  • +Practical learning through internships and workshops

Nothing to show

Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and poor campus infrastructure are a recurring problem.
  • -The curriculum often lacks practical application and relevance.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a recurring problem.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are frequently mentioned.
  • -Communication and support from staff are often inadequate.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant concern.
  • -Poor organization and communication among staff lead to problems.
  • -Lack of adequate academic structure and support is evident.
  • -Administrative inefficiencies and excessive wait times for simple tasks.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and unclear curriculum focus.
  • -Lack of student support and unwelcoming faculty interaction.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a recurring complaint.
  • -Communication breakdowns and unclear expectations lead to student dissatisfaction.
  • -Administrative and registration errors cause significant hassle and unexpected costs.
  • -Poor teaching quality and lack of engaging learning environments are prevalent.
  • -Inadequate student support, including limited facilities and poor communication, detracts from the experience.

Nothing to show

Rating summary
What students say

Across various aspects, this institution shows considerable strengths, particularly in **Internationality**, earning a near-perfect score. **Location** and **Value** also received very high marks. Student life and professors are rated positively, as are facilities. However, the lowest-rated category is **Accomodation**, indicating an area for potential improvement.

With an overall strong showing, this institution excels particularly in **Location**, receiving its highest rating. **Professors** and **Value** also garnered impressive scores, indicating student satisfaction in these key areas. Conversely, **Accomodation** and **Internationality** present the weakest points, scoring notably lower than other surveyed aspects. **Facilities** and **Student Life** fall within the upper-middle range of ratings.

This institution presents a strong academic profile, with exceptional ratings for its professors and facilities. Location and internationality also score well. Student life and accommodation represent areas with lower, though still respectable, scores compared to other aspects. The overall value for money is perceived positively, aligning with the location rating.

With outstanding marks for its internationality, this university also excels in location. Areas for improvement include accommodation, which received the lowest score, and facilities, though still solid. Professors, student life, and value all garnered respectable ratings, indicating a generally positive student experience.

This institution garners excellent marks across the board. Its strongest areas, with perfect scores, are its facilities, professors, and prime location. Student life, accommodation, internationality, and perceived value are also highly rated, all receiving a 4.5. Overall, it presents a very appealing profile with no significant weaknesses identified.

An overall positive assessment emerges from these university ratings, with the institution excelling in **Location** (4.37) and **Internationality** (4.24). **Facilities** and **Professors** also receive high marks, both scoring approximately 4.17. The areas receiving the lowest scores are **Accomodation** (3.59), indicating room for improvement in this aspect, followed by **Student Life** and **Value**, both rated around 3.9.

Nothing to show

Reviews summary
Highlights

Approximately 97.6% of reviews are positive, highlighting rewarding experiences, multicultural environments, and personal/professional growth. A single negative review mentioned the EMIB program should be updated.

With an average rating of 4.22/5 from 23 reviews, ~74% are highly positive. Students praise excellent lecturers and a recognized reputation, while no negative feedback was noted.

Nearly all reviews are positive, praising passionate lecturers and well-organized programs. A small percentage of feedback mentions concerns about program structure and course coordination.

With an average rating of 3.98/5, ~74% of 128 reviews are positive, praising diversity and international student support. A small percentage (~8.6%) of reviews mention administrative delays and some professor communication issues.

Both reviews are highly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students praised the high education level, great lectures, and experienced professors.

With a 4.19/5 rating from 42 reviews, approximately 86% highlight positive aspects like university development, program quality, and organized processes. A small ~5% of feedback points to issues with administrative errors and a perceived lack of student immersion.

Nothing to show

Rating distribution
5★
55%
35%
44%
34%
100%
43%
0%
4★
38%
52%
49%
45%
0%
43%
0%
3★
5%
13%
3%
15%
0%
10%
0%
2★
0%
0%
0%
6%
0%
0%
0%
1★
2%
0%
5%
3%
0%
5%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked
Great international exposure

To me, studying at ESCP has been a really rewarding experience. The multicultural environment helped me grow both personally and professionally. Professors are very supportive and bring real-world insights into the classroom. I rlly liked the flexibility to study in different campuses across Europe. Although some admin processes can be slow, but overall I felt well-prepared for the job market.

Aerospace Engineering Bachelor's

Well defined and well-maintained classes with highly trained professors. They are very much timely and can happily assist you and your questions during consultation 1 to 1. You can learn a great deal of Aerospace Engineering tools and get inspired by student clubs flying rockets and gliders, and racing cars.

Practical and modern

Overall, i would rate programme at SWPS positively. What stands out the most is the practical approach to lerning. Many lectures have real professional expierience and often explain topics throhu examples from thier field, not only through theory or slides. The atmosphere is modern, open and quite relaxed, wich makes it easier to feel comfortable as a student. I also like that the university encourages independent thinking and discussion. However the organization could be better, especially considering the tuition fees. Some classes feel more useful and better prepared than others.

Supportive Environment and Practical Learning

Vistula University offers a supportive academic environment with experienced faculty and diverse international students. I appreciated the practical approach to learning and access to industry-related projects. The administrative processes could be improved, but overall, I would definitely recommend it to students seeking a globally oriented education.

I am glad to study here

I would definitely recommend Collegium Humanum to other students. High education level, I was able to learn a lot of new skills, professors with huge experience in the professional sector - this is why I highly rate

Arts and Culture

The art studios are equipped with the necessary tools and materials for creative expression. The school auditorium hosts various cultural events and performances, providing a platform for students to showcase their talents.

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close