Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Moscow School of Management SKOLKOVO vs Innopolis University vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS
Side-by-side comparison from 236 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Practical skills and real-world experience
- +Supportive environment and positive social life
- +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
- +High academic quality & skilled faculty
- +Global outlook & diverse programs
- +Career opportunities & strong network
- +Engaging, relevant instruction from passionate, supportive faculty.
- +Emphasis on analytical thinking and practical application of concepts.
- +International and collaborative community
- +Strong focus on practical, real-world projects
- +Expert faculty and personalized mentorship
Nothing to show
- +Practical, results-driven business education
- +Actionable assignments and real-world application
- +Experienced professors and industry insights
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
- -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are often outdated and poorly maintained.
- -Course content can be irrelevant or not up-to-date.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
- -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.
Nothing to show
Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.
This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.
This institution achieves perfect scores across all assessed areas. Its facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and overall value are all rated a stellar 5 out of 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong and well-rounded university experience with no discernible weak points based on this rating system.
Demonstrating notable strengths, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, the **Internationality** aspect appears to be the weakest area, alongside **Accomodation** and **Location**. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within the middle tier of assessments.
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.
Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.
With one review, the average rating is 5/5. The feedback is overwhelmingly positive, highlighting engaging coursework, interactive instructors, and supportive guidance. No negative feedback was received.
With ~90% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.08/5, students praise the university's focus on practical, tech-driven learning, international community, and collaborative environment. No negative reviews were recorded.
Nothing to show
With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Knowledge and study here are very good and professors are professionals. Students life is pretty boring in the early years, but it is getting to be better thou. Here you are taught in English and professors are from all around the world. Most of the international students are from Latin countries.
Nothing to show
If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.
Nothing to show