Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU vs National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE vs Innopolis University vs Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS vs Eurasian Management and Administration School

Side-by-side comparison from 236 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Center for Creative Leadership (5.00)
Saint Petersburg State University - SPSU: wins 0/7 categories
National Research University Higher School of Economics - HSE: wins 0/7 categories
Innopolis University: wins 0/7 categories
Moscow International Higher Business School - MIRBIS: wins 0/7 categories
Eurasian Management and Administration School: wins 2/7 categories
Elbrus Coding Bootcamp: wins 0/7 categories
Center for Creative Leadership: wins 5/7 categories
Comparing
Best programme: Applied Mathematics
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Innopolis, Russia
4.10
Read more reviews
155 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Executive MBA
Not rated
Read more reviews
0 reviews
×
Best programme: Psychology of Human Resources Development
Category ratings
Facilities
4.25
4.14
4.56
Not rated
4.30
Not rated
5.00
Win
Location
3.95
4.67
3.72
Not rated
4.34
Not rated
5.00
Win
Professors
4.10
4.33
4.43
Not rated
4.78
Not rated
5.00
Win
Internationality
4.50
4.18
3.44
Not rated
4.82
Win
Not rated
4.00
Student life
4.75
4.10
4.05
Not rated
4.29
Not rated
5.00
Win
Value
4.20
4.48
4.13
Not rated
4.88
Not rated
5.00
Win
Accommodation
3.93
3.99
3.69
Not rated
4.23
Win
Not rated
3.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +Practical skills and real-world experience
  • +Supportive environment and positive social life
  • +Quality teaching and engaging subjects
  • +High academic quality & skilled faculty
  • +Global outlook & diverse programs
  • +Career opportunities & strong network
  • +International and collaborative community
  • +Strong focus on practical, real-world projects
  • +Expert faculty and personalized mentorship

Nothing to show

  • +Practical, results-driven business education
  • +Actionable assignments and real-world application
  • +Experienced professors and industry insights

Nothing to show

  • +Student-centered support and inclusivity
  • +Welcoming and understanding community
Cons
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of support and clear communication from staff is prevalent.
  • -Administrative and management issues hinder student support.
  • -Inconsistent teaching quality and subjective academic processes are problematic.
  • -Unrealistic exam difficulty and demanding workloads cause frustration.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of clear communication and support is a recurring problem.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
  • -Poor communication and lack of support from staff are prevalent.

Nothing to show

  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Facilities are often described as outdated or poorly maintained.
  • -Course content is perceived as irrelevant or not up-to-date.
Rating summary
What students say

Examining the university's performance reveals exceptional strengths, particularly in **Student Life** (4.75) and **Internationality** (4.5). Facilities and value also received positive scores. Conversely, **Location** (3.95) and **Accomodation** (3.925) represent areas with room for improvement, though professors garnered a respectable 4.1 rating.

This institution demonstrates a particularly strong showing in its **Location**, receiving the highest rating. Value and Professors are also highly regarded. Conversely, the **Accomodation** received the lowest score among the evaluated aspects. The university also scores well in Internationality, Facilities, and Student Life, indicating a generally positive overall perception with a few areas for potential improvement.

Demonstrating notable strengths, this institution excels in its **Facilities**, achieving a near-perfect score. **Professors** also receive high marks. Conversely, the **Internationality** aspect appears to be the weakest area, alongside **Accomodation** and **Location**. **Student Life** and **Value** fall within the middle tier of assessments.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strength in **Value** and **Internationality**, both scoring very high. **Professors** also receive a strong rating, indicating high academic quality. **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accomodation** are all rated solidly, suggesting a good overall student experience. The lowest-rated area, though still positive, is **Location**.

Nothing to show

This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores awarded for Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, and Value. These areas represent the university's most outstanding attributes. The accommodation rating of 3 indicates a moderate but not exceptional aspect of the student experience. Internationality also scores well at 4, suggesting a generally welcoming environment for global students.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With an average rating of 4.25/5, ~88% of reviews are positive, highlighting theoretical and soft skill development, good faculty, and enjoyable extracurriculars. There are no negative reviews.

Around 96% of reviews are positive, highlighting high-quality education, excellent faculty, and valuable connections. A small portion of feedback mentions issues with some professors and the grading system.

With ~90% positive reviews and an average rating of 4.08/5, students praise the university's focus on practical, tech-driven learning, international community, and collaborative environment. No negative reviews were recorded.

Nothing to show

With an average rating of 4.82/5 from 49 reviews, ~100% of feedback is positive. Students highly praise the school's practical, results-driven business education and real-world application. Modules and assignments are frequently highlighted for their immediate applicability.

Nothing to show

With one review, the university is highly rated at 5/5. This positive feedback highlights excellent student care and a welcoming environment. No negative reviews were received.

Rating distribution
5★
38%
65%
18%
0%
82%
0%
100%
4★
50%
22%
72%
0%
18%
0%
0%
3★
13%
9%
10%
0%
0%
0%
0%
2★
0%
4%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Best IT university in Russia

Knowledge and study here are very good and professors are professionals. Students life is pretty boring in the early years, but it is getting to be better thou. Here you are taught in English and professors are from all around the world. Most of the international students are from Latin countries.

Nothing to show

A Premier Choice for Ambitious Business Leaders

If you’re looking for a practical, results-driven business education that makes a real impact, the Eurasian Management & Administration School (EMAS) is an excellent choice. EMAS stands out as one of the strongest business schools in Central and Eastern Europe, offering MBA, Executive MBA, DBA, and business coaching programs that focus on real-world implementation and strategic thinking. DBA at EMAS transformed my leadership and boosted my Business vision, it’s a Strategic DBA, that gives real business impact. The DBA sharpened my executive edge. In all it’s a Practical DBA, great support, real impact.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close