Université Paris-Sorbonne vs IÉSEG School of Management vs SKEMA Business School vs EDHEC Business School vs Excelia Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 543 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +High academic quality and rigor
- +Engaging and enriching learning experience
- +Positive campus environment and student activities
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international and diverse community
- +Opportunities for personal and professional growth
- +Practical, career-focused programs with industry relevance
- +Supportive faculty and international student environment
- +Opportunities for hands-on experience and personal development
- +High-quality, practical teaching from experienced professors
- +Strong industry connections and career support
- +Valuable alumni network and networking opportunities
- +Practical curriculum and quality teaching
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Career preparation and alumni network
- +High-quality, practical education with flexible pathways
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous activities and events
- +Supportive and international learning environment
- +Exceptional teaching quality from passionate, experienced instructors
- +Unmatched precision, emphasis on quality, and professional skill development
- +Welcoming environment, strong support, and valuable alumni network
- -Administrative and management issues create constant problems.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are significant drawbacks.
- -Lack of support and unhelpful staff lead to student frustration.
- -Frequent last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve the classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Administrative and management issues hinder student experience.
- -Poor communication and guidance are significant concerns for students.
- -Teaching faculty needs improvement and a less business-focused approach.
- -Steep tuition fees strain financial investment.
- -Superficial course content and lack of practical application
- -Unprofessional training and limited career support relative to cost
- -Mismatch between program offerings and student expectations
- -Poorly prepared and unhelpful professors.
- -Disorganized and irrelevant course content.
- -High cost for low value.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are disappointing.
- -The curriculum feels irrelevant and disconnected from real-world needs.
This institution garners strong ratings across several key areas. Its location is exceptionally well-regarded, alongside excellent scores for professors, internationality, and overall value. While facilities and accommodation also receive solid marks, student life stands out as the weakest area compared to the other surveyed aspects.
This institution demonstrates notable strengths in several key areas, with Internationality receiving the highest score. Location and Value also received very favorable ratings. Conversely, Accomodation emerged as the area with the lowest score, indicating room for improvement in this aspect of the student experience. Overall, the university presents a compelling offering across most dimensions.
Overall, the university garners positive feedback across most aspects. Professors and internationality stand out as its strongest points, receiving particularly high scores. Student life and facilities also rate well. However, accommodation presents the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other categories. The university offers a generally good value for its students.
An analysis of university ratings reveals a generally positive reception across key aspects. Internationality stands out as the strongest area, receiving the highest score. Conversely, accommodation was rated lowest among the surveyed categories. Facilities, professors, student life, and value all received solid marks, indicating a well-rounded student experience with areas for potential improvement.
Analyzing the provided ratings, the university excels particularly in **Internationality** and **Student Life**, both scoring above 4.25. **Location** also receives a strong endorsement. Conversely, **Accomodation** presents as the weakest area, with a rating of 3.57. Other aspects like **Facilities**, **Professors**, and **Value** fall within a respectable mid-range, generally hovering around the 4.0 mark.
Overall, the university demonstrates a solid performance across various aspects. Its strongest areas are **Location** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.18), suggesting these are significant advantages. **Accomodation** (3.48) received the lowest score, indicating potential room for improvement in this category. Other ratings for Facilities, Professors, Internationality, and Value are all above 3.8, indicating generally positive feedback.
This university demonstrates exceptional strength in its **location** (4.7), **professors** (4.6), and **internationality** (4.6). Students are particularly impressed with the quality of instruction and the global environment. Conversely, **accommodation** stands out as the lowest-rated area at 3.0, suggesting room for improvement in this aspect. Student life and value for money also received moderate scores.
With an average rating of 4.17/5 from 12 reviews, ~83% of feedback is positive, highlighting strong academic rigor and interesting content. No negative feedback was reported.
Overwhelmingly positive feedback, with ~91% of reviews being 4-5 stars and an average rating of 4.38/5. A small ~0.8% expressed concerns about learning outcomes and last-minute changes.
Most reviews are positive (~97.3%), praising practical, career-focused courses and knowledgeable instructors. A small percentage of negative feedback mentions program disorganization and communication issues.
~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting outstanding teaching quality, practical courses, and strong corporate/alumni networks for career development. One review expressed concerns about high tuition fees relative to investment.
~89% of reviews are positive, highlighting practical curriculum, good teaching, and international environments. A small minority (~5%) found courses superficial or lacking practical value.
With a 3.96 average rating from 23 reviews, ~82% highlight the school's high-quality education, diverse academic pathways, and vibrant campus life. A small portion (~9%) reported unprepared professors and organizational issues.
Students highly praise the exceptional quality of teaching and knowledgeable instructors. Facilities are noted as impeccable and the learning environment welcoming, contributing to professional and personal growth for ~100% of reviewers.
The university is very good, professors are very well experienced in their respective domain. Its located in the center of Paris, it's very accessible to all types of students. But we have to improve more in the life of students, but its good at all.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
I absolutely love everything about EDHEC, beginning from the pedagogy to the atmosphere it provides to the students (especially international) on campus. The extracurricular activities like sports, associations are very helpful. Also, the career service provided is top-notch. Therefore, I would call it an enriching experience so far.
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a positive experience at ESSCA. The programme is well organized and provides a solid foundation in business and management. The courses were generally of good quality and covered a broad range of topics, helping students develop both academic knowledge and practical skills. One of the aspects I appreciated most was the international exchange during the third year. ESSCA has a good network of partner universities, and the opportunity to study abroad was a valuable part of the programme. Student life is also a real strength of the school. The associative environment is active and offers many opportunities to get involved outside the classroom, meet new people, and gain additional experience. Like any programme, some courses were more engaging than others, but overall I found the experience enriching and would recommend it to students looking for a business school with a strong international dimension and a good balance between academics and extracurricular activities.
I really enjoyed my time at LCB! I've found that my skills when I entered the work force were much higher than others. I think though there was a big portion missing in recipe development and composition. True- we did learn it through memorizing the recipes, but we really were missing classes on how different ingredients affect the final textures.. how you can change them... etc. That I still am not an expert in .. and I create recipes! Ouf! Also, I don't know if you still do a month of sugar work... but that really wasn't necessary and should be either cut or minimized to just 2 lessons. It's such a niche skill to know that I would have really preferred more technical skills. I loved the old location. The "rumors" I'm getting about the new location are that it's not as good, unfortunately - that i's become more of a money focused/marketing machine. I really hope that this image can be fixed as I love LCB and enjoyed my time there! Oh also - there should be more help for students to get jobs and featuring old students accomplishments - from cookbook launches to new bakeries so that current and old students can support them.
