Yildiz Technical University vs BI Norwegian Business School - BI vs MountCrest University College - MCU vs NHH Norwegian School of Economics vs Sopot University of Applied Sciences

Side-by-side comparison from 27 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted

Quick verdict
Higher overall rating: Tie
Yildiz Technical University: wins 0/1 categories
BI Norwegian Business School - BI: wins 0/1 categories
MountCrest University College - MCU: wins 0/1 categories
NHH Norwegian School of Economics: wins 0/1 categories
Sopot University of Applied Sciences: wins 0/1 categories
Idaho state university: wins 1/1 categories
Østfold University College: wins 0/1 categories
Comparing
Best programme: French and Linguistics
Best programme: B.Sc. in International Business Administration
Best programme: Bachelor of Law LLB
Best programme: Economics and Finance
Best programme: Architecture
Boise, Idaho, United States
5.00
Read more reviews
1 reviews
×
Best programme: Computer Science
Best programme: Electrical and Control Engineering
Category ratings
Facilities
4.56
4.50
4.33
4.71
4.00
5.00
Win
4.00
Location
4.75
4.50
5.00
4.14
5.00
5.00
4.00
Professors
4.44
4.50
4.67
4.43
5.00
5.00
3.00
Internationality
4.00
4.00
4.67
4.43
5.00
5.00
4.00
Student life
4.25
4.00
5.00
4.29
4.00
5.00
5.00
Value
4.44
3.00
5.00
4.14
5.00
5.00
4.00
Accommodation
4.33
3.00
4.33
4.71
4.00
5.00
5.00
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • +beautiful campus environment and blend of old and new architecture
  • +supportive professors and a stimulating academic atmosphere
  • +enriching learning experiences and academic opportunities
  • +Knowledgeable lecturers and strong academic environment
  • +Practical approach and industry connections
  • +Good location and food variety
  • +High-quality facilities and serene learning environment
  • +Strong academic programs and well-versed lecturers
  • +Opportunities for personal growth and talent nurturing
  • +Free tuition and diverse program options
  • +High quality education and international exchange opportunities
  • +Supportive environment and welcoming community
  • +Supportive and accessible professors and staff.
  • +Small class sizes and individual attention.
  • +Supportive professors & ample library resources
  • +Well-organized classrooms
  • +Strong internship opportunities
  • +Practical, real-world applications and project-based learning
  • +Balanced theory and lab work focus
  • +Strong curriculum in core engineering areas
Cons
  • -Disappointing social activities and overall university experience.
  • -Students dislike the lack of proper support and communication from staff.
  • -They often complain about outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources.
  • -Students express frustration with the curriculum and teaching methods being unengaging or irrelevant.
  • -Outdated facilities and equipment are a consistent disappointment.
  • -Communication breakdowns and administrative inefficiencies create frustration.
  • -Overcrowded classes and lack of personalized attention negatively impact the learning experience.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a recurring concern.
  • -Poor teaching quality and curriculum relevance are often criticized.
  • -Ineffective administrative and management processes cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and resources hinder learning experiences.
  • -Poor communication and lack of clarity on important information are recurring problems.
  • -Administrative and management issues are a significant source of frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are frequently criticized.
  • -Poor communication and a lack of transparency are common complaints.
  • -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
  • -Outdated facilities and technology hinder the learning experience.
  • -Lack of student support and engagement from staff is a consistent complaint.
Rating summary
What students say

This university demonstrates notable strengths in its **Location**, receiving a near-perfect score. **Facilities** are also highly regarded, followed closely by **Accomodation** and **Value**. While **Student Life** and **Professors** maintain solid ratings, **Internationality** is the comparatively weaker area, though still respectable. Overall, the university presents a well-rounded offering with a particular emphasis on its prime location and impressive facilities.

This institution demonstrates remarkable strengths, with exceptional ratings for its Facilities, Professors, and Location, all scoring an impressive 4.5. Student Life and Internationality also receive solid marks at 4. However, Accommodations and Value emerge as areas needing development, each receiving a lower score of 3.

This institution receives outstanding marks across several key areas, notably achieving perfect scores for **Location**, **Student Life**, and **Value**. **Facilities** and **Accomodation** are also well-regarded, though slightly less so than its top performers. The university's **Professors** and **Internationality** are also areas of significant strength. The weakest-rated category, while still strong, is **Facilities** and **Accomodation**.

This institution receives exceptionally high marks for its facilities and accommodation, both scoring an outstanding 4.7. Professors and internationality are also strong points, with ratings of 4.4. Student life and value for money are rated at 4.3 and 4.1 respectively. The university's location is its weakest area, though still a respectable 4.1.

This institution achieves exceptional scores, particularly in **Professors**, **Location**, **Internationality**, and **Value**, all receiving perfect marks. Areas like **Facilities**, **Student Life**, and **Accommodation** are also strong, earning a solid 4 out of 5. No significant weaknesses are identified in this rating set, indicating a well-rounded and highly regarded academic environment.

Across all surveyed aspects, this institution achieves top marks. It excels uniformly with perfect scores in facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value. With no weaker areas identified, the university presents a consistently outstanding profile, indicating satisfaction across the board for its offerings and environment.

This institution demonstrates notable strengths in student life and accommodation, both receiving perfect scores. Facilities and internationality are also highly regarded. While the location garners a strong rating, the professorial quality is the weakest area, scoring a 3. Overall, the university offers a commendable experience with particularly excellent offerings in its social and living environments.

Reviews summary
Highlights

With ~92% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.33/5, students praise the university's professional environment, good professors, and blend of modern and historic facilities. A small amount of negative feedback mentions unmet expectations, particularly regarding social activities.

With an average rating of 4/5, student feedback is highly positive. Reviewers consistently praise the great location, knowledgeable lecturers, and strong academic environment. Industry connections and a practical approach to education were also highlighted.

All three reviews are highly positive, giving a 5/5 average rating. Students praise advanced facilities, nurturing environments, and strong academic preparation. No negative feedback was received.

Reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~0% negative feedback. Students praise the free tuition and wide range of masters specializations, highlighting a conducive academic and diverse environment.

With a perfect 5/5 average rating from one review, the university is praised for professors' dedication and helpful staff, fostering individualized attention in small groups. No negative feedback was provided.

This university has a single review, which is overwhelmingly positive, resulting in a 5/5 average rating. The feedback highlights excellent professors and library resources.

With a single review, the average rating is 4/5. This feedback highlights a solid and practical MSc in Electrical Engineering, emphasizing real-world applications, balanced theory and lab work, and project-based learning.

Rating distribution
5★
50%
0%
100%
29%
100%
100%
0%
4★
42%
100%
0%
57%
0%
0%
100%
3★
0%
0%
0%
14%
0%
0%
0%
2★
8%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
1★
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Most useful review
Most liked

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

AN INSTITUTION OF THE FUTURE

Best university in terms of facilities .Highly advanced labs and research facilities.Located inthe outskirts of a major town thefore providing a serine learning environment .The institution focuses on talent nuturing through sports.

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

Nothing to show

This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Review our Privacy Policy for more details.
Close