Bucharest Academy of Economic Studies - ASE vs Constantin Brancoveanu University - CB vs Romanian-American University vs Romanian-American School Of Business - ASEBUSS vs Faculty of Economics and Business Administration - FSEGA
Side-by-side comparison from 108 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Supportive and knowledgeable professors
- +Strong, practical, and well-structured programs
- +Good career opportunities and academic reputation
- +Strong academic programs and diverse specializations
- +Valuable career support and opportunities
- +Generous scholarships and a prestigious reputation
- +Excellent, knowledgeable, and approachable professors.
- +Practical and well-structured courses with real-world application.
- +Numerous career, internship, and international exchange opportunities.
Nothing to show
- +Supportive and accessible professors
- +Relevant and enriching programmes
- +Opportunities for personal growth and networking
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Outdated facilities and irrelevant curriculum.
- -Lack of student focus and prioritization.
- -Perceived as a money-making institution with poor value.
- -Inconsistent and ineffective communication from administration is a major source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of necessary resources negatively impact the learning environment.
- -Students feel that coursework and assessment methods are often poorly designed or unfairly implemented.
- -Constant and disruptive construction noise negatively impacts sleep and living conditions.
Nothing to show
- -Administrative & management issues are a frequent source of frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources are commonly cited.
- -Inconsistent or unengaging teaching quality impacts learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
The university demonstrates a remarkably strong performance in its **Location**, achieving a score of 4.62. Student Life also received high marks at 4.39, with Accommodation and Value scoring favorably around 4.08 and 4.05 respectively. Conversely, **Facilities** emerged as the lowest-rated area, registering at 3.79. Professors and Internationality also fell within a similar mid-range, with scores of 3.89 and 3.80.
Remarkably, this institution received perfect scores in every surveyed category. Facilities, professors, location, student life, accommodation, internationality, and value were all rated a perfect 5. This indicates an exceptionally strong all-around performance with no discernible weak areas.
This institution demonstrates a well-rounded performance, with **Internationality** standing out as its strongest attribute. Students also rated **Professors** highly. Areas for potential improvement include **Location** and **Accomodation**, which received the lowest scores. Other aspects like Facilities, Student Life, and Value fall within a solid mid-range.
Nothing to show
This university garners exceptionally high marks in several key areas, notably Facilities, Location, and Value, all receiving ratings above 4.8. Student Life and Accommodation also score well, with 4.5 and 4.2 respectively. Professors are rated a solid 4. The weakest area appears to be Internationality, which at 3.83 is the lowest score among the surveyed categories.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
~98% of reviews are positive, praising knowledgeable and supportive professors, structured programs, and good career opportunities. A small ~2% of feedback mentioned outdated facilities and a perceived lack of student-focused administration.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 rating. Students highlight a diversity of specializations, job fairs, workshops, scholarships, and campus prestige as key strengths. No negative feedback was recorded.
With an average rating of 4.17/5, ~83% of reviews are positive. Students praise knowledgeable and approachable professors, well-structured curricula, and interactive teaching methods. One negative review mentioned disruptive drilling noise.
Nothing to show
With ~100% positive feedback, students highlight great teachers, modern facilities, and strong communication. They also praise student organizations and a supportive campus atmosphere. No negative reviews were provided.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, I had a very positive experience with the International Economics programme. The courses provided a solid understanding of global markets, trade, monetary policy, development, and the economic forces shaping international business The programme could still improve in terms of administration, communication, and consistency across courses. Some classes felt more practical and engaging than others.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show