Stockholm University - SU vs Uppsala University vs Lund University vs Umea University - UMU vs Jönköping University - JU
Side-by-side comparison from 137 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Inspiring and knowledgeable professors
- +Engaging and flexible course content
- +Supportive campus environment
- +High-quality education and research-driven learning
- +Friendly and knowledgeable academic and non-academic staff
- +Practical, real-life learning experiences and student-centered guidance
- +Vibrant student life & community
- +High-level education & academic structure
- +Global diversity & inclusive environment
- +Welcoming international community
- +Positive professor interactions
- +Well-structured campus environment
- +International and diverse student body
- +Practical, hands-on learning with real-world projects
- +Supportive environment with inspiring teachers
- +Welcoming atmosphere and helpful, caring staff
- +Flexible course options and manageable academic rigor
- +Hands-on, immersive, and creative learning with freedom to shape studies.
- +Direct industry insights and practical application from experienced professionals.
- +Strong focus on building relationships with driven, like-minded peers.
- -Poor administrative and management responsiveness to student issues.
- -Lack of adequate support for academic and personal conflicts.
- -Negative peer attitudes and lack of collaboration hinder learning.
- -Disappointing program quality and instructor approach.
- -Student disinterest and sabotage of work.
- -Discrimination and poor job prospects in Sweden
- -Lack of sufficient financial support and career services
- -Poor quality and outdated educational facilities
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and insufficient resources hinder learning.
- -Lack of clear communication and support from instructors is a problem.
- -Poor academic quality and unhelpful faculty.
- -High tuition costs are not justified by the educational experience.
- -Significant challenges with job prospects and societal inclusion for immigrants due to racism.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are common complaints.
- -Course content and teaching quality are often perceived as subpar.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of modern resources are a problem.
- -Course content and teaching quality often fall short of expectations.
Perceived strengths of this institution lie with its professors, receiving a strong rating of 4.24. Value and facilities also scored well, both above 4.1. Conversely, the location was the least favorably rated category at 3.77. Student life and accommodation are rated at a solid 4 and 3.85 respectively.
Examining the university's performance reveals a strong showing in academic and campus-related aspects. Professors (4.15) and Facilities (4.10) received particularly high marks. Student Life (4.08) and Internationality (4.00) also scored well. Conversely, the university's Location (3.66) and Accomodation (3.68) represent areas for potential improvement, while Value (3.98) falls in the mid-range.
With an impressive student life rating of 4.45, this institution excels in extracurricular engagement. Accommodations, while solid at 4.01, represent the lowest-scoring category. Other areas like facilities, professors, location, internationality, and value all fall within a strong range between 4.18 and 4.30, indicating a generally well-rounded university experience.
This institution excels in its internationality, receiving a perfect score of 5. Academics and facilities are also highly regarded, both earning a 4. Conversely, accommodation presents the most significant area for improvement, with a rating of 2. Student life and overall value are also positively rated at 4. The location receives a moderate score of 3.
This institution generally receives positive feedback, with particular strengths in **internationality (4.2)**, **value (4.1)**, and **professors (4)**, alongside excellent **facilities** and **student life**. Accommodation is the comparatively weakest area, scoring **3.4**. The location also received a slightly lower, though still respectable, rating.
This institution excels in its **facilities**, earning a high 4.75. **Accommodations** also score well at 4.5, alongside a strong **internationality** rating of 4.25. Conversely, **student life** presents an area for potential improvement, marked by the lowest score of 3.625. Ratings for **professors** and **location** fall within a mid-range, while **value** also receives a solid 4.
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths, with perfect scores in Facilities, Location, Student Life, and Value. Professors and Internationality also received high marks, rated at 4 and 4.5 respectively. Accomodation stands out as the comparatively weakest area, though still very good at 4.5, reflecting a generally positive and well-rounded university experience.
With an average rating of 4.11/5, ~96% of reviews are positive, praising approachable and knowledgeable professors, engaging teaching, and good campus life. A small percentage of negative feedback exists.
With 43 reviews, ~98% are positive, praising academic excellence, quality education, and friendly staff. One review expressed disappointment with a specific course's peer and instructor attitudes.
With a 4.4/5 average rating, ~98% of reviews are positive, highlighting excellent student life, high-level education, and global diversity. One negative review cited issues with the country, not the university itself.
The sole review is positive, rating 4/5. Students praise the university's nice structure and professors, noting a significant international student presence. Minor areas for improvement were mentioned in the chemistry department.
With an average rating of 4.21/5, ~93% of reviews are positive, highlighting a highly international environment, practical learning, and student life. One ~7% review found the study difficulty low.
With a 4/5 average rating and all feedback positive, reviews highlight good flexibility, course options, and a welcoming campus atmosphere. Staff are described as helpful and approachable, fostering student success.
Both university reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with an average rating of 5/5. Students highlight the immersive, hands-on approach, freedom to shape studies, and the opportunity to build relationships. Approximately 0% of feedback is negative.
SU is a quite vibrant school and I am quite satisfied so far. I believed my programme can help unlock multiple career prospects in the future, The professors are kind and always willing to provide assistance.
Uppsala itself is a great city, it's easy to go to Stockholm and Arlanda. But to be in Uppsala as a university student is a whole experience on its own. With Nations, parties, fikas, cafés, parties (yes again), bars, knitting groups and many other events Uppsala has a place for everyone. (The other Universities in the top 3 would be Lund University and...... well the third is not set in stone as there are a few universities and "högskolor" to choose from" In my experience professors and teachers, competence will vary depending. But the great ones are really great.
The university is beautiful, there is no doubt about that. Although it is one of the most multicultural campuses in the world, the course I took was not inclusive for foreign students. The course was advertised as a course designed specifically for foreigners, with classes in English. In practice, many of the classes on the syllabus were actually in Swedish, and the ones that were in English gave exercises or texts in Swedish. I even had a disagreement with one of the professors who, although he was teaching a class that was supposed to be entirely in English, brought slides in Swedish and spoke exclusively in Swedish. When I asked during the break if the class shouldn't be in English, he ridiculed me in front of the class and said that if I was uncomfortable, I should have said so beforehand. The universitys advisors were very understanding, but in the end, I had to give up many of the assigned subjects and replace them with subjects that had nothing to do with my field, just because they were, in fact, taught in English.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
I knew I wanted to study marketing, but what made me choose Mälardalen University was the international twist on their marketing program. To get the International Marketing degree it's mandatory to go on an exchange semester (I went to Paris and it was amazing!) and many of the classes have an international angle. Most of the professors were really good - they based our assignments on real life issues and they truly cared about our success. To add to the real life experience we also had many guest lecturers giving us great insight into different marketing professions. Since the school is relatively new the facilities and especially the library are very nice. The one down side is the fact that Västerås isn't a big student city. There are some student activities going on, but it is far from the student life in the big university cities.
Nothing to show
