Concordia University vs Université de Montréal vs School of Digital Arts, Animation and Design - NAD-UQAC vs Cestar College of Business, Health & Technology vs College CDI
Side-by-side comparison from 194 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Welcoming and supportive faculty
- +Practical and relevant programs
- +Positive and engaging campus environment
- +Engaging and knowledgeable faculty
- +Diverse and challenging course offerings
- +Hands-on learning and research opportunities
- +Industry-relevant opportunities and professional preparation
- +Supportive and attentive faculty guidance
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Industry-active instructors and professional preparation
- +Supportive and welcoming atmosphere
- +Emphasis on practical, project-based learning
- -Poor teaching quality and difficult-to-understand instructors are a recurring issue.
- -Students dislike the outdated and uncomfortable facilities.
- -Exam design and content quality, including errors and excessive difficulty, are a significant concern.
- -Limited class options and poor social life.
- -Outdated and depressing campus facilities.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of modern resources are a significant concern.
- -Poor communication and a lack of administrative support create frustration.
- -Overcrowded classrooms and insufficient individual attention hinder learning.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Facilities are frequently described as outdated and in poor condition.
- -Teaching quality and curriculum relevance are inconsistent and often disappointing.
This university garners its highest marks in **Internationality (4.53)** and **Location (4.50)**, indicating these are significant strengths. Student life and value are also well-regarded, both scoring above 4.2. The weakest area is **Accomodation**, receiving a rating of 3.92, suggesting room for improvement. Professors and facilities are rated competently around the 4.1 mark.
Overall, this university garners favorable reviews, with professors receiving the highest marks at 4.24. Student life and value for money are also well-regarded, both scoring 4.03. Facilities and internationality are similarly strong, with ratings around 4.11 and 4.19 respectively. The weakest area identified is accommodation, which sits at 3.71.
Overall, the university scores well in several key areas. Its strongest aspects are professors, student life, and accommodation, all receiving top marks. Facilities and internationality are identified as areas with moderate ratings. The university also performs well in terms of location and value.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
This institution demonstrates exceptional strengths in its **Value** (4.67) and **Facilities** (4.47), indicating high satisfaction in these key areas. **Accomodation** (4.33) and **Student Life** (4.20) also received positive scores. However, the university's **Location** (3.13) stands out as a comparatively weaker aspect, with **Internationality** (3.87) also receiving a moderate rating.
With ~90% positive feedback and an average rating of 4.28/5, students praise the friendly, inclusive, and entrepreneurial campus environment. A small percentage of negative reviews mention issues with teaching quality and exam design.
University of Montreal reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~97%), highlighting knowledgeable professors, engaging coursework, and helpful staff. A small amount of negative feedback (~3%) mentioned limited course options, a dated campus, and social life challenges.
With a 5/5 average rating, this university is highly regarded by students, who praise its industry opportunities and career preparation. ~100% of feedback is positive, highlighting supportive teachers.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a 4.4/5 average rating from 15 reviews, ~93% are positive. Students praise quality teaching from industry professionals and a supportive, welcoming atmosphere. The heavy workload and project-focused curriculum prepare them well for professional careers.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
