Université du Québec à Montréal - UQAM vs Concordia University vs John Abbott College vs École de technologie supérieure - ETS vs Cargair Flight Academy
Side-by-side comparison from 151 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Helpful professors and supportive staff
- +Strong marketing & business programs with useful real-world application
- +Vibrant student life and integration support
- +Practical, relevant coursework and knowledgeable, supportive professors
- +Encouraging entrepreneurial mindset and collaborative environment
- +Strong career support and networking opportunities
- +Excellent facilities and a positive, historic campus atmosphere.
- +High-quality teaching and engaging, challenging academic programs.
- +Vibrant campus life with numerous extracurricular activities.
- +Lack of English support for international students
- +Limited scholarship opportunities for non-French speakers
- +Difficulty finding part-time employment
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- +Teaching excellence and faculty dedication
- +Interactive and engaging learning environment
- +Personalized attention and academic success
- -Lack of support and slow communication.
- -Inconsistent teaching quality and communication barriers with instructors.
- -Poorly designed and error-filled exams.
- -Lack of student support and academic accommodation.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a common complaint.
- -Inefficient administrative processes and lack of support are frequently mentioned.
- -Lack of practical application and career relevance in coursework is a recurring concern.
- -Administrative and management issues are a significant problem.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of necessary resources are a common complaint.
- -The quality and relevance of the curriculum are often criticized.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
- -Administrative and management issues cause frequent problems.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources are common complaints.
- -Poor communication and lack of support from staff create frustration.
This university receives its highest marks in Location, with a strong showing also in Student Life and Value. Professors are rated well, as is Accomodation. Internationality and Facilities, while still solid, represent the areas with slightly lower scores in this assessment.
An assessment of this institution reveals a very strong showing in **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring exceptionally high. Conversely, **Accomodation** represents the lowest-rated aspect. Other categories like **Facilities**, **Professors**, **Student Life**, and **Value** all received solid scores, indicating a generally positive university experience with specific areas of outstanding performance and one area for potential improvement.
This institution excels in several key areas, boasting perfect scores for **Facilities** and **Location**, alongside a strong showing in **Student Life**. However, areas for improvement are apparent in **Accomodation** and **Value**, both receiving a rating of 3. Ratings for **Professors** and **Internationality** fall in the upper-mid range.
A notable strength of this institution is its prime **Location**, scoring a high 4.5. Conversely, **Student Life** presents a significant area for improvement, with a low rating of 1.5. The university also received solid ratings in **Professors** and **Value** (both 3.5), with **Facilities** and **Accomodation** averaging 3. **Internationality** sits in the middle at 2.5.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Overall, the university demonstrates exceptionally strong performance across most surveyed aspects. It received perfect scores in Facilities, Professors, Location, Student Life, Accomodation, and Value. The weakest area, while still positive, is Internationality, rated at a commendable 4. This suggests a highly desirable institution with outstanding offerings in nearly every dimension, with a slight opportunity for enhanced global engagement.
Around 92% of reviews are positive, highlighting helpful professors, useful and interesting programs, and a supportive student environment. One negative review cited a lack of support.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive, with ~97% rating 4-5 stars. Students highlight practical, relevant programs and supportive professors. A small minority of reviews (approx. 3%) cite issues with teacher communication and exam quality.
The single review is overwhelmingly positive, giving a 5/5 rating. It highlights an amazing campus with good facilities, new library, and great buildings. Teachers were also praised, though a discrepancy in program difficulty was noted.
With an average rating of 4/5 from two reviews, positive feedback comprises approximately 50% of the sentiment. Students highlight French language requirements and inflation as challenges, while one positive review commends the university for not requiring French for graduate students.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
With a single review, this university received a 4/5 average rating. The feedback was entirely positive, highlighting teaching excellence and a dynamic learning environment.
After considering UQAM for my studies, I ultimately decided against it due to the lack of support I experienced. While the university's programs seemed promising, the insufficient support infrastructure made me hesitant to commit. The limited communication channels and slow response times left me feeling uncertain about my ability to navigate challenges effectively. Ultimately, I chose to pursue my education elsewhere, where I felt confident in the support system provided.
Concordia University's linguistics program is a well-rounded introduction to the field of study for any aspiring linguist. The required courses allow students to browse all areas of the field, ranging from syntax to historical linguistics. Once you find your niche within the program, you can pick and choose what to learn from the more advanced courses. My favorite course during my time in the program was a special topics class on Old Egyptian. Mark Hale, the incredible professor who taught the course, inspired my passion for classical languages. My only critique of the program is the lack of advertised resources pertaining to post-graduate endeavors in the field. More information shared on graduate studies might have been helpful early on in the program. In conclusion, Concordia University is a great institution as long as you're passionate about your studies and well-engaged in your program.
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
Nothing to show
