IÉSEG School of Management vs Université de Strasbourg - UNISTRA vs emlyon business school vs SKEMA Business School vs ESCE Paris International Business School
Side-by-side comparison from 519 verified student reviews. Scan one row at a time — winners are highlighted
- +Engaging and practical learning experiences
- +Strong international community and global opportunities
- +Supportive professors and active student associations
- +International environment and diverse student life
- +High-quality academics and supportive professors
- +Engaging courses with practical applications
- +Practical, international focus and diverse student body.
- +Strong career support and professional experience opportunities.
- +Diverse program options and personal project development.
- +strong international exposure & opportunities
- +practical and relevant program curriculum & skills
- +valuable alumni network & career support
- +International environment and diverse student body
- +Engaging and challenging academic programs taught by industry professionals
- +Supportive staff and personalized learning experiences
- +International focus and diverse student body
- +Supportive and engaging faculty
- +Dynamic student life and activities
- +Culturally diverse environment and international campus access
- +Supportive and organized academic environment with helpful instructors
- +Opportunities for career advancement and independent learning
- -Last-minute changes disrupt scheduling and planning.
- -Perceived lack of effort to improve classroom experience.
- -Concerns about course offerings and professor quality.
- -Outdated and poorly maintained facilities, including dirty and neglected campus areas and issues with pests in student residences and dining facilities.
- -Significant administrative and management problems that negatively impact student experience.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and a lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Administrative and management issues, including poor communication and disorganization.
- -Perceived focus on profit over student welfare, with concerns about teaching quality and discrimination.
- -Ineffective career guidance and support for students.
- -Administrative and management issues cause significant frustration.
- -Outdated facilities and lack of resources hinder learning.
- -Poor communication and unclear expectations lead to dissatisfaction.
- -Outdated facilities and poor maintenance are a frequent concern.
- -Administrative and management issues cause frustration.
- -Lack of resources and support hinders learning.
- -Lack of extracurriculars and limited opportunities for lower-year students.
- -Poor campus environment and a perceived low academic standard.
This university receives high marks across most categories, particularly excelling in **Internationality** (4.55). **Location** (4.29), **Student Life** (4.25), and **Value** (4.31) also demonstrate considerable strengths. Conversely, **Accomodation** (3.78) stands out as the weakest area among the assessed aspects, while **Facilities** (4.09) received a solid, yet comparatively lower, rating.
With a strong emphasis on student experience, this university excels in **Student Life** and **Location**, both receiving ratings above 4.4. **Internationality** also scores well at 4.27. Areas for improvement include **Accomodation**, which earned the lowest score at 3.73, followed by **Facilities** at 3.95. **Professors** and **Value** demonstrate solid performance, with ratings around 4.1.
This institution demonstrates a generally positive standing, with its strongest areas being **Location** and **Internationality**, both scoring above 4.6. **Student Life** and **Value** also received high marks, around 4.3 and 4.49 respectively. The **Facilities** and **Professors** are rated well, in the low 4s. **Accomodation** appears to be the relatively weakest area, with a score of 4.
A comprehensive assessment reveals a university with distinct strengths and areas for improvement. Professors and internationality stand out as particularly strong aspects, receiving high marks. Student life and facilities are also rated positively. However, accommodation emerges as the weakest area, with a noticeably lower score compared to other metrics. Value for money is also a solid, though not exceptional, performer in this rating overview.
This institution receives outstanding marks for its facilities, professors, and location, all scoring an impressive 4.75. Student life and value are also well-regarded at 4.25, with internationality close behind at 4.5. The weakest area of performance is accommodation, receiving a rating of 3.5. Overall, the university demonstrates significant strengths in its core offerings and campus environment.
A review of university ratings reveals a well-rounded institution. The strongest aspects appear to be Location and Internationality, both scoring above 4.3. Professors and Value are also highly rated, at 4.17. Areas for potential improvement include Facilities and Accomodation, which received scores of approximately 3.9. Student Life sits at a solid 4.
With a strong emphasis on location and internationality, this university also scores very well for its professors and student life. Value for money is also a positive aspect. The weakest areas, while still respectable, are its facilities and accommodation.
With a 4.38/5 average, ~99% of reviews are positive, praising interesting classes, international experiences, and practical preparation for work. A minimal 0.8% of feedback is negative, citing some course content and last-minute changes.
University of Strasbourg reviews are predominantly positive (~97.6%), highlighting international atmosphere, knowledgeable professors, and engaging courses. A small fraction (~2.4%) notes issues with campus maintenance and facilities.
University reviews are overwhelmingly positive (~90% 4-5 stars) with an average rating of 4.53/5. Students praise the academic rigor, practical and international focus, and diverse student body.
Around 97% of reviews are positive, praising international opportunities, practical curriculum, and helpful alumni networks. A small percentage (around 3%) cite issues with management, communication, and organization.
With an average rating of 4.25/5, 100% of feedback is positive. Students highlight excellent international environments and engaging programs, often taught by experienced professionals. Some note a preference for in-person learning over online options.
Students highly praise the university's international environment, supportive professors, and dynamic student life. Approximately 83% of feedback is positive, with no negative reviews.
With a 4.54/5 average rating, nearly all students praise Schiller for its culturally rich environment and global opportunities. A small portion of feedback (~7.7%) suggests the university may be better suited for those seeking a less demanding academic path.
IÉSEG offers interactive teaching and international opportunities. I had the chance to go on an exchange to another country, which opened up new perspectives for me. The courses in Lille are stimulating, and the professors are very involved in our success.
The ITIRI (faculty of translation) guarantees a high-quality linguistic preparation, as long as some practical classes that help understand what it would really be like to be a translator. There's an admission test and it costs 4500 per year. The master lasts 2 years.
Nothing to show
My experience in SKEMA Business School is very much enriching. It definitely help me to shape my career aspirations which align with my personal value and even worldview. The management system in my university quite efficient and systematic. Every year, we, students are required to give personal feedback on our learning and courses for each semesters. It is very helpful as it could assist my university to improve its lacking in every aspects.
In an MSc fast track program, I had the privilege of spending time a large and intensive period with each educator, including supporting staff. From core marketing classes to general soft skill and one on one meetings, a large sum went above and beyond what was expected. From moral, educational, in some cases emotional support, the staff laid down a foundation for me to grow and reach my truest potential. In their own personal capacities, each staff took a unique approach to part with their knowledge, wisdom, support and experience. From an educational perspective, the educators sparked curiosity, critical and analytical thinking in me, allowing me to look at the world of business, advertising and marketing in a new light. While some information may have come across as “far fetched” or “hard to believe” it showcased that the program wasn’t merely looking to scratch the surface, but project the future, years in advance. With majority of the courses I take, I found my own passion for the content, mounding it in a way that I could use, apply and consider in my professional career. However, at the core of my memorable experience was the personal contact I had with a large majority ESCE professional staff. They made me feel welcome, accepted, and seen, allowing me to voice my thoughts, my own experience, and knowledge. I believe my masters success would not be possible without the influence of all members at ESCE.
Nothing to show
Schiller university is the best thing that can ever happen to anyone l will never regret the day l applied and l mostly love their campus in Germany it has nice aesthetics and obviously l love their culture
